Literature DB >> 16339644

In vitro-derived "neural stem cells" function as neural progenitors without the capacity for self-renewal.

Gregory P Marshall1, Eric D Laywell, Tong Zheng, Dennis A Steindler, Edward W Scott.   

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cells have been defined by their ability to self-renew and successfully reconstitute hematopoiesis throughout the life of a transplant recipient. Neural stem cells (NSCs) are believed to exist in the regenerating regions of the brain in adult mice: the subependymal zone (SEZ) of the lateral ventricles (LVs) and the hippocampal dentate gyrus. Cells from the SEZ can be cultured to generate neurospheres or multipotent astrocytic stem cells (MASCs), both of which demonstrate the stem cell qualities of multipotency and self-renewal in vitro. Whether neurospheres and MASCs possess the true stem cell quality of functional self-renewal in vivo is unknown. The definitive tests for this unique capability are long-term engraftment and serial transplantation. Both neurospheres and MASCs transplanted into the LVs of C57BL/6 mice resulted in short-term engraftment into the recipient brain, with donor-derived migratory neuroblasts visible in the rostral migratory stream and olfactory bulb after transplantation. To test in vivo expansion/self-renewal of the transplanted cells, we attempted to reisolate donor-derived neurospheres and MASCs. Even when rigorous drug selection was used to select for rare events, no donor-derived neurospheres or MASCs could be reisolated. Furthermore, donor-derived migratory neuroblasts were not observed in the rostral migratory stream (RMS) for more than 1 month after transplantation, indicating a transient rather than long-term engraftment. Therefore, in vitro-derived neurospheres and MASCs do not function as NSCs with long-term, self-renewal capabilities in vivo but instead represent short-term neural progenitor cells as defined by an in vivo functional assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16339644     DOI: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0245

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  6 in total

1.  Stem cells in microfluidics.

Authors:  Huei-Wen Wu; Chun-Che Lin; Gwo-Bin Lee
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 2.  Neurospheres: a potential in vitro model for the study of central nervous system disorders.

Authors:  Laura da Silva Siqueira; Fernanda Majolo; Ana Paula Bornes da Silva; Jaderson Costa da Costa; Daniel Rodrigo Marinowic
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 2.316

Review 3.  TGF-β family signaling in stem cells.

Authors:  Masayo Sakaki-Yumoto; Yoko Katsuno; Rik Derynck
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-08-16

4.  Muscle reorganisation through local injection of stem cells in the diaphragm of mdx mice.

Authors:  Thais Borges Lessa; Rafael Cardoso Carvalho; André Luis Rezende Franciolli; Lilian Jesus de Oliveira; Rodrigo Silva da Nunes Barreto; David Feder; Fabiana Fernandes Bressan; Maria Angélica Miglino; Carlos Eduardo Ambrósio
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 1.695

5.  Neurotoxic effects of AZT on developing and adult neurogenesis.

Authors:  Meryem Demir; Eric D Laywell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Induction of neuronal differentiation of rat muscle-derived stem cells in vitro using basic fibroblast growth factor and ethosuximide.

Authors:  Mi Lan Kang; Jin Seon Kwon; Moon Suk Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-03-25       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.