BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI may be used for noninvasive assessment of atherosclerotic lesions; however, MRI evaluation of plaque composition requires validation against an accepted reference standard, such as the American Heart Association (AHA) lesion grade, defined by histopathological examination. METHODS: Forty-eight carotid endarterectomy specimen cross-sections had AHA lesion grade determined histopathologically and were concurrently imaged using combinations of 8 MRI contrast weightings in vitro. A maximum likelihood classification algorithm generated MRI "maps" of plaque components, and an AHA lesion grade was assigned correspondingly. Additional analyses compared classification accuracy obtained with a commonly used set of magnetic resonance contrast weightings [proton density (PDw), T1 (T1w), and partial T2 (T2w)] to accuracy obtained with the combination of PDw, T1w, and diffusion-weighted (Dw) contrast. RESULTS: For the 8-contrast combination, the sensitivities for fibrous tissue, necrotic core, calcification, and hemorrhage detection were 83%, 67%, 86%, and 77%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 81%, 78%, 99%, and 97%. Good agreement (79%) between magnetic resonance and histopathology for AHA classification was achieved. For the PDw, T1w, and Dw combination, the overall classification accuracy was insignificantly different at 78%, whereas the overall classification accuracy using PDw, T1w, and partial T2w contrast weightings was significantly lower at 67%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof-of-principle that the composition of atherosclerotic plaques determined by automated classification of high-resolution ex vivo MRI accurately reflects lesion composition defined by histopathological examination.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MRI may be used for noninvasive assessment of atherosclerotic lesions; however, MRI evaluation of plaque composition requires validation against an accepted reference standard, such as the American Heart Association (AHA) lesion grade, defined by histopathological examination. METHODS: Forty-eight carotid endarterectomy specimen cross-sections had AHA lesion grade determined histopathologically and were concurrently imaged using combinations of 8 MRI contrast weightings in vitro. A maximum likelihood classification algorithm generated MRI "maps" of plaque components, and an AHA lesion grade was assigned correspondingly. Additional analyses compared classification accuracy obtained with a commonly used set of magnetic resonance contrast weightings [proton density (PDw), T1 (T1w), and partial T2 (T2w)] to accuracy obtained with the combination of PDw, T1w, and diffusion-weighted (Dw) contrast. RESULTS: For the 8-contrast combination, the sensitivities for fibrous tissue, necrotic core, calcification, and hemorrhage detection were 83%, 67%, 86%, and 77%, respectively. The corresponding specificities were 81%, 78%, 99%, and 97%. Good agreement (79%) between magnetic resonance and histopathology for AHA classification was achieved. For the PDw, T1w, and Dw combination, the overall classification accuracy was insignificantly different at 78%, whereas the overall classification accuracy using PDw, T1w, and partial T2w contrast weightings was significantly lower at 67%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides proof-of-principle that the composition of atherosclerotic plaques determined by automated classification of high-resolution ex vivo MRI accurately reflects lesion composition defined by histopathological examination.
Authors: A A Appel; C-Y Chou; J C Larson; Z Zhong; F J Schoen; C M Johnston; E M Brey; M A Anastasio Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Karim Lekadir; Alfiia Galimzianova; Angels Betriu; Maria Del Mar Vila; Laura Igual; Daniel L Rubin; Elvira Fernandez; Petia Radeva; Sandy Napel Journal: IEEE J Biomed Health Inform Date: 2016-11-22 Impact factor: 5.772
Authors: Ye Qiao; Itamar Ronen; Jason Viereck; Frederick L Ruberg; James A Hamilton Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2007-03-22 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: R Bitar; A R Moody; S Symons; G Leung; S Crisp; A Kiss; A Nelson; R Maggisano Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2010-05-13 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Taku Yoneyama; Jie Sun; Daniel S Hippe; Niranjan Balu; Dongxiang Xu; William S Kerwin; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: M Wintermark; S S Jawadi; J H Rapp; T Tihan; E Tong; D V Glidden; S Abedin; S Schaeffer; G Acevedo-Bolton; B Boudignon; B Orwoll; X Pan; D Saloner Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-02-13 Impact factor: 3.825