K Laas1, R Peltomaa, H Kautiainen, K Puolakka, M Leirisalo-Repo. 1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Kasarmikatu 11-13, PO Box 263, FIN-00029 HUS, Finland. karin.laas@helsinki.fi
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical and work disability costs for patients with chronic inflammatory joint disease during one year before and one year after institution of infliximab treatment in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Starting from 1999, clinical and laboratory variables for patients treated with biological agents for inflammatory rheumatic diseases were systematically recorded at Helsinki University Central Hospital. From this database clinical information was collected on 96 patients in whom infliximab was started during the period 1999 to 2001. Economic analyses were based on costs incurred because of outpatient and inpatient visits, orthopaedic operations, drugs used, and days on sickness or rehabilitation allowance. Medical and work disability costs were calculated separately for the one year period before (period I) and the one year period after institution of infliximab (period II). RESULTS: Of the study group of 96 patients (arthritis duration 16 years (range 3 to 43)), 74 completed one year of infliximab treatment. Their clinical and laboratory variables improved significantly. The mean increase in medical costs during period II was euro12 015 (95% confidence interval, 6496 to 18,076). A minimal decrease in work disability costs occurred-mean decrease euro130 (-1268 to 1072). CONCLUSIONS: One year treatment with infliximab in patients with longstanding aggressive arthritis showed a good clinical effect but raised medical costs significantly. Work disability costs failed to show a substantial decrease. Starting infliximab in the earlier stages of chronic arthritis could in the long term prevent work disability and thus decrease the total cost to society.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medical and work disability costs for patients with chronic inflammatory joint disease during one year before and one year after institution of infliximab treatment in routine clinical practice. METHODS: Starting from 1999, clinical and laboratory variables for patients treated with biological agents for inflammatory rheumatic diseases were systematically recorded at Helsinki University Central Hospital. From this database clinical information was collected on 96 patients in whom infliximab was started during the period 1999 to 2001. Economic analyses were based on costs incurred because of outpatient and inpatient visits, orthopaedic operations, drugs used, and days on sickness or rehabilitation allowance. Medical and work disability costs were calculated separately for the one year period before (period I) and the one year period after institution of infliximab (period II). RESULTS: Of the study group of 96 patients (arthritis duration 16 years (range 3 to 43)), 74 completed one year of infliximab treatment. Their clinical and laboratory variables improved significantly. The mean increase in medical costs during period II was euro12 015 (95% confidence interval, 6496 to 18,076). A minimal decrease in work disability costs occurred-mean decrease euro130 (-1268 to 1072). CONCLUSIONS: One year treatment with infliximab in patients with longstanding aggressive arthritis showed a good clinical effect but raised medical costs significantly. Work disability costs failed to show a substantial decrease. Starting infliximab in the earlier stages of chronic arthritis could in the long term prevent work disability and thus decrease the total cost to society.
Authors: E Kruithof; F Van den Bosch; D Baeten; A Herssens; F De Keyser; H Mielants; E M Veys Journal: Ann Rheum Dis Date: 2002-03 Impact factor: 19.103
Authors: P E Lipsky; D M van der Heijde; E W St Clair; D E Furst; F C Breedveld; J R Kalden; J S Smolen; M Weisman; P Emery; M Feldmann; G R Harriman; R N Maini Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-11-30 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: M Elaine Husni; Agnes L Maier; Philip J Mease; Steven S Overman; Patricia Fraser; Ellen M Gravallese; Michael E Weinblatt Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2002-05
Authors: R N Maini; F C Breedveld; J R Kalden; J S Smolen; D Furst; M H Weisman; E W St Clair; G F Keenan; D van der Heijde; P A Marsters; P E Lipsky Journal: Arthritis Rheum Date: 2004-04
Authors: Tuulikki Sokka; Hannu Kautiainen; Theodore Pincus; Suzanne M M Verstappen; Amita Aggarwal; Rieke Alten; Daina Andersone; Humeira Badsha; Eva Baecklund; Miguel Belmonte; Jürgen Craig-Müller; Licia Maria Henrique da Mota; Alexander Dimic; Nihal A Fathi; Gianfranco Ferraccioli; Wataru Fukuda; Pál Géher; Feride Gogus; Najia Hajjaj-Hassouni; Hisham Hamoud; Glenn Haugeberg; Dan Henrohn; Kim Horslev-Petersen; Ruxandra Ionescu; Dmitry Karateew; Reet Kuuse; Ieda Maria Magalhaes Laurindo; Juris Lazovskis; Reijo Luukkainen; Ayman Mofti; Eithne Murphy; Ayako Nakajima; Omondi Oyoo; Sapan C Pandya; Christof Pohl; Denisa Predeteanu; Mjellma Rexhepi; Sylejman Rexhepi; Banwari Sharma; Eisuke Shono; Jean Sibilia; Stanislaw Sierakowski; Fotini N Skopouli; Sigita Stropuviene; Sergio Toloza; Ivo Valter; Anthony Woolf; Hisashi Yamanaka Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2010-03-12 Impact factor: 5.156