Literature DB >> 16339003

Distal gap junctions and active dendrites can tune network dynamics.

Fernanda Saraga1, Leo Ng, Frances K Skinner.   

Abstract

Gap junctions allow direct electrical communication between CNS neurons. From theoretical and modeling studies, it is well known that although gap junctions can act to synchronize network output, they can also give rise to many other dynamic patterns including antiphase and other phase-locked states. The particular network pattern that arises depends on cellular, intrinsic properties that affect firing frequencies as well as the strength and location of the gap junctions. Interneurons or GABAergic neurons in hippocampus are diverse in their cellular characteristics and have been shown to have active dendrites. Furthermore, parvalbumin-positive GABAergic neurons, also known as basket cells, can contact one another via gap junctions on their distal dendrites. Using two-cell network models, we explore how distal electrical connections affect network output. We build multi-compartment models of hippocampal basket cells using NEURON and endow them with varying amounts of active dendrites. Two-cell networks of these model cells as well as reduced versions are explored. The relationship between intrinsic frequency and the level of active dendrites allows us to define three regions based on what sort of network dynamics occur with distal gap junction coupling. Weak coupling theory is used to predict the delineation of these regions as well as examination of phase response curves and distal dendritic polarization levels. We find that a nonmonotonic dependence of network dynamic characteristics (phase lags) on gap junction conductance occurs. This suggests that distal electrical coupling and active dendrite levels can control how sensitive network dynamics are to gap junction modulation. With the extended geometry, gap junctions located at more distal locations must have larger conductances for pure synchrony to occur. Furthermore, based on simulations with heterogeneous networks, it may be that one requires active dendrites if phase-locking is to occur in networks formed with distal gap junctions.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16339003     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00662.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  20 in total

1.  Nonsynaptic NMDA receptors mediate activity-dependent plasticity of gap junctional coupling in the AII amacrine cell network.

Authors:  W Wade Kothmann; E Brady Trexler; Christopher M Whitaker; Wei Li; Stephen C Massey; John O'Brien
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Inferring connection proximity in networks of electrically coupled cells by subthreshold frequency response analysis.

Authors:  Corrado Calì; Thomas K Berger; Michele Pignatelli; Alan Carleton; Henry Markram; Michele Giugliano
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Compartmental neural simulations with spatial adaptivity.

Authors:  Michael J Rempe; Nelson Spruston; William L Kath; David L Chopp
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-06       Impact factor: 1.621

4.  The robustness of phase-locking in neurons with dendro-dendritic electrical coupling.

Authors:  Michael A Schwemmer; Timothy J Lewis
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Seizure-induced alterations in fast-spiking basket cell GABA currents modulate frequency and coherence of gamma oscillation in network simulations.

Authors:  Archana Proddutur; Jiandong Yu; Fatima S Elgammal; Vijayalakshmi Santhakumar
Journal:  Chaos       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 3.642

Review 6.  Synchrony and so much more: Diverse roles for electrical synapses in neural circuits.

Authors:  Barry W Connors
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 3.964

7.  A bushy cell network in the rat ventral cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Ricardo Gómez-Nieto; María E Rubio
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.215

8.  Synaptic noise and physiological coupling generate high-frequency oscillations in a hippocampal computational model.

Authors:  William C Stacey; Maciej T Lazarewicz; Brian Litt
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-08-05       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Cortical spreading depression-new insights and persistent questions.

Authors:  A Charles; Kc Brennan
Journal:  Cephalalgia       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 6.292

10.  A novel role of dendritic gap junction and mechanisms underlying its interaction with thalamocortical conductance in fast spiking inhibitory neurons.

Authors:  Qian-Quan Sun
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-10-29       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.