Literature DB >> 16338992

Texture signals in whisker vibrations.

Joerg Hipp1, Ehsan Arabzadeh, Erik Zorzin, Jorg Conradt, Christoph Kayser, Mathew E Diamond, Peter König.   

Abstract

Rodents excel in making texture judgments by sweeping their whiskers across a surface. Here we aimed to identify the signals present in whisker vibrations that give rise to such fine sensory discriminations. First, we used sensors to capture vibration signals in metal whiskers during active whisking of an artificial system and in natural whiskers during whisking of rats in vivo. Then we developed a classification algorithm that successfully matched the vibration frequency spectra of single trials to the texture that induced it. For artificial whiskers, the algorithm correctly identified one texture of eight alternatives on 40% of trials; for in vivo natural whiskers, the algorithm correctly identified one texture of five alternatives on 80% of trials. Finally, we asked which were the key discriminative features of the vibration spectra. Under both artificial and natural conditions, the combination of two features accounted for most of the information: The modulation power-the power of the part of the whisker movement representing the modulation due to the texture surface-increased with the coarseness of the texture; the modulation centroid-a measure related to the center of gravity within the power spectrum-decreased with the coarseness of the texture. Indeed, restricting the signal to these two parameters led to performance three-fourths as high as the full spectra. Because earlier work showed that modulation power and centroid are directly related to neuronal responses in the whisker pathway, we conclude that the biological system optimally extracts vibration features to permit texture classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338992     DOI: 10.1152/jn.01104.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  34 in total

1.  Optimal decision-making in mammals: insights from a robot study of rodent texture discrimination.

Authors:  Nathan F Lepora; Charles W Fox; Mathew H Evans; Mathew E Diamond; Kevin Gurney; Tony J Prescott
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Embodied information processing: vibrissa mechanics and texture features shape micromotions in actively sensing rats.

Authors:  Jason T Ritt; Mark L Andermann; Christopher I Moore
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Low-dimensional sensory feature representation by trigeminal primary afferents.

Authors:  Michael R Bale; Kyle Davies; Oliver J Freeman; Robin A A Ince; Rasmus S Petersen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Mechanisms of tactile information transmission through whisker vibrations.

Authors:  Eran Lottem; Rony Azouz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Populations of striatal medium spiny neurons encode vibrotactile frequency in rats: modulation by slow wave oscillations.

Authors:  Thomas G Hawking; Todor V Gerdjikov
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-10-31       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Correlated physiological and perceptual effects of noise in a tactile stimulus.

Authors:  Armin Lak; Ehsan Arabzadeh; Justin A Harris; Mathew E Diamond
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Wideband phase locking to modulated whisker vibration point to a temporal code for texture in the rat's barrel cortex.

Authors:  Tobias A S Ewert; Johannes Möller; Andreas K Engel; Christiane Vahle-Hinz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Effect of whisker geometry on contact force produced by vibrissae moving at different velocities.

Authors:  George E Carvell; Daniel J Simons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-28       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Weaker feedforward inhibition accounts for less pronounced thalamocortical response transformation in mouse vs. rat barrels.

Authors:  E E Kwegyir-Afful; H T Kyriazi; D J Simons
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The advantages of a tapered whisker.

Authors:  Christopher M Williams; Eric M Kramer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.