Literature DB >> 16338797

The barriers to clinical coding in general practice: a literature review.

S de Lusignan1.   

Abstract

Clinical coding is variable in UK general practice. The reasons for this remain undefined. This review explains why there are no readily available alternatives to recording structured clinical data and reviews the barriers to recording structured clinical data. Methods used included a literature review of bibliographic databases, university health informatics departments, and national and international medical informatics associations. The results show that the current state of development of computers and data processing means there is no practical alternative to coding data. The identified barriers to clinical coding are: the limitations of the coding systems and terminologies and the skill gap in their use; recording structured data in the consultation takes time and is distracting; the level of motivation of primary care professionals; and the priority within the organization. A taxonomy is proposed to describe the barriers to clinical coding. This can be used to identify barriers to coding and facilitate the development of strategies to overcome them.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338797     DOI: 10.1080/14639230500298651

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Inform Internet Med        ISSN: 1463-9238


  21 in total

1.  Pandemic preparedness starts in properly coded electronic health records.

Authors:  Pablo Millares Martin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  The Inadequacy of Coding Nomenclature to Represent the Timeline of a Disease (Like Diabetes).

Authors:  Pablo Millares Martin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2020-06-10

3.  Validation of Diagnostic Coding for Diabetes Mellitus in Hospitalized Patients.

Authors:  Clarissa C Ren; Mohammed S Abusamaan; Nestoras Mathioudakis
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2022-02-04       Impact factor: 3.701

4.  An observational study of public and private general practitioner consultations in the Republic of Ireland.

Authors:  M Murphy; G Brodie; S Byrne; C Bradley
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Association between fee-for-service expenditures and morbidity burden in primary care.

Authors:  Troels Kristensen; Kim Rose Olsen; Henrik Schroll; Janus Laust Thomsen; Anders Halling
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-02

6.  70,489 primary care encounters: retrospective analysis of morbidity at a primary care centre in Ireland.

Authors:  D Molony; C Beame; W Behan; J Crowley; T Dennehy; M Quinlan; W Cullen
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 1.568

7.  "There are too many, but never enough": qualitative case study investigating routine coding of clinical information in depression.

Authors:  Kathrin Cresswell; Zoe Morrison; Dipak Kalra; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Caring for the patient, caring for the record: an ethnographic study of 'back office' work in upholding quality of care in general practice.

Authors:  Deborah Swinglehurst; Trisha Greenhalgh
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Filmed Monologue Vignettes: a novel method for investigating how clinicians document consultations in electronic health records.

Authors:  Simon Glew; Elizabeth M Ford; Helen Elizabeth Smith
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2018-11-14

10.  Double-blind control of the data manager doesn't have any impact on data entry reliability and should be considered as an avoidable cost.

Authors:  Davide Mauri; Vasiliki Karampoiki; Jacopo Mauri; Konstantinos Kamposioras; Georgios Alexiou; Georgios Ferentinos; Lamprini Tsali; Ioanna Karathanasi; Christina Peponi
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2008-10-20       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.