Literature DB >> 16338711

Cross-sectional analysis of BMI and some lifestyle variables in Flemish vegetarians compared with non-vegetarians.

K Alewaeters1, P Clarys, M Hebbelinck, P Deriemaeker, J P Clarys.   

Abstract

Epidemiological studies on vegetarians indicate that appropriately planned vegetarian diets are associated with certain health benefits, which may lower mortality and morbidity. A healthy lifestyle, such as regular physical activity and avoidance of harmful practices, such as smoking and heavy drinking, could also influence these positive health-related outcomes in vegetarians. This study reports BMI, smoking and drinking habits, engagement in physical activity, medication use and subjective health perception in a vegetarian population (women: n = 206, mean age 37.0 +/- 12.3 years; men: n = 120, mean age 42.3 +/- 15.9 years) as compared with a reference Belgian population (women: n = 4993, mean age 49.8 +/- 18.0 years; men: n = 4666, mean age 48.0 +/- 17.1 years). When considering the vegetarian group as a whole, the vegetarians had a lower mean BMI compared with the reference population (respectively 22.1 +/- 3.1 kg/m2 compared with 24.6 +/- 4.8 kg/m2 for women (p < 0.001) and respectively 22.6 +/- 3.6 kg/m2 compared with 25.7 +/- 4.0 kg/m2 for men (p < 0.001)). Vegetarians smoked less than subjects of the reference group (13.5% compared with 28.5% respectively; p < 0.001). During weekdays the percentage of subjects consuming alcoholic drinks in the two populations was comparable (32.8 in the vegetarian and 35.8 in the reference population; p = 0.159). During the weekend, more subjects of the reference population drank alcohol compared with the vegetarian subjects (70.2% vs. 58.6% respectively; p = 0.026). More vegetarians were involved in intensive physical activity (over 4 h per week) compared with the reference population (36.8% vs. 17.3% respectively; p < 0.001), while fewer vegetarians were involved in moderate physical activity (up to 4 h per week) compared with subjects of the reference group (28.2% and 51.0% respectively; p < 0.001). Percentages of subjects involved in no physical activity were comparable in both groups (vegetarians 34.9 vs. reference subjects 31.8; p = 0.625). Use of prescribed medication was lower among the vegetarians (25.5% compared with 47.3% in the reference population; p < 0.001), while use of non-prescribed drugs was comparable between both groups (34.1% in the vegetarian group and 28.2% in the reference group; p = 0.580). More vegetarian subjects perceived their health to be good to very good compared with the subjects of the reference population (90.4% vs. 77.2% respectively; p < 0.001). The significant difference for the BMI values when comparing the vegetarian males and females with the reference population cannot be completely explained by the evaluated lifestyle characteristics. However, the lower BMI values in vegetarians are in agreement with the literature.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16338711     DOI: 10.1080/00140130500101031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  11 in total

1.  Health aspects, nutrition and physical characteristics in matched samples of institutionalized vegetarian and non-vegetarian elderly (> 65yrs).

Authors:  Dirk Aerenhouts; Dolf De Ridder; Marcel Hebbelinck; Peter Clarys; Peter Deriemaeker
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 4.169

2.  Nutritional status of Flemish vegetarians compared with non-vegetarians: a matched samples study.

Authors:  Peter Deriemaeker; Katrien Alewaeters; Marcel Hebbelinck; Johan Lefevre; Renaat Philippaerts; Peter Clarys
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.717

3.  Association between Motives for Dish Choices during Home Meal Preparation and Weight Status in the NutriNet-Santé Study.

Authors:  Pauline Ducrot; Philippine Fassier; Caroline Méjean; Benjamin Allès; Serge Hercberg; Sandrine Péneau
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Cross-sectional analyses of participation in cancer screening and use of hormone replacement therapy and medications in meat eaters and vegetarians: the EPIC-Oxford study.

Authors:  Tammy Y N Tong; Paul N Appleby; Kathryn E Bradbury; Timothy J Key
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  The Paradox of Ingestion of Dietary Cholesterol in "Vegans"-Reply.

Authors:  Peter Clarys; Tom Deliens; Inge Huybrechts; Peter Deriemaeker; Barbara Vanaelst; Willem De Keyzer; Marcel Hebbelinck; Patrick Mullie
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Vegetarian Diets and Medical Expenditure in Taiwan-A Matched Cohort Study.

Authors:  Chin-Lon Lin; Jen-Hung Wang; Chia-Chen Chang; Tina H T Chiu; Ming-Nan Lin
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Vegetarian diet and its possible influence on dental health: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Kirsten P J Smits; Stefan Listl; Milica Jevdjevic
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 3.383

8.  Dietary pattern analysis: a comparison between matched vegetarian and omnivorous subjects.

Authors:  Peter Clarys; Peter Deriemaeker; Inge Huybrechts; Marcel Hebbelinck; Patrick Mullie
Journal:  Nutr J       Date:  2013-06-13       Impact factor: 3.271

9.  Comparison of nutritional quality of the vegan, vegetarian, semi-vegetarian, pesco-vegetarian and omnivorous diet.

Authors:  Peter Clarys; Tom Deliens; Inge Huybrechts; Peter Deriemaeker; Barbara Vanaelst; Willem De Keyzer; Marcel Hebbelinck; Patrick Mullie
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 5.717

10.  Anthropometric and physiologic characteristics in white and British Indian vegetarians and nonvegetarians in the UK Biobank.

Authors:  Tammy Yn Tong; Timothy J Key; Jakub G Sobiecki; Kathryn E Bradbury
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 7.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.