Literature DB >> 16337466

A pilot study of the usefulness and safety of a ready-to-use atopy patch test (Diallertest) versus a comparator (Finn Chamber) during cow's milk allergy in children.

Nicolas Kalach1, Pascale Soulaines, Delphine de Boissieu, Christophe Dupont.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patch testing is used in the diagnosis of food allergy, especially during delayed manifestations.
OBJECTIVE: A ready-to-use atopy patch test (APT), the Diallertest, was compared with another APT device, the Finn Chamber, in pediatric cow's milk allergy.
METHODS: This prospective study involved 49 children (34.3 +/- 17 [mean +/- SD] months of age), with cow's milk allergy manifested by atopic dermatitis (10.2%), digestive manifestations (40.8%), or both (49%). All children underwent both APT techniques, with a reading 72 hours after application, followed by a milk elimination diet for 4 to 6 weeks and open cow's milk challenge.
RESULTS: A positive result was seen in 22 (44.8%) versus 13 (26.5%) patients with the ready-to-use and the comparator APTs, respectively. No side effects were recorded. Both techniques were concordant in 67.3% of patients. Of the total 41 open cow's milk challenges, 60.9% had positive results, with 8 patients lost to follow-up. The performances of the ready-to-use and comparator APTs were as follows: sensitivity, 76% (95% CI, 59.2% to 92.7%) versus 44% (95% CI, 24.5% to 63.4%; P = .02); specificity, 93.8% (95% CI, 81.9% to 100%) versus 93.8% (95% CI, 81.9% to 100%); positive predictive value, 95% (95% CI, 85.4% to 100%; 1 false-positive result) versus 91.7% (95% CI, 76% to 100%; 1 false-positive result); negative predictive value, 71.4% (95% CI, 52% to 90.7%; 6 false-negative results) versus 51.7% (95% CI, 33.5% to 69.8%; 14 false-negative results); and test accuracy, 82.9% (95% CI, 71.3% to 94.5%) versus 63.4% (95% CI, 48.6% to 78.1%; P = .05).
CONCLUSION: The ready-to-use APT exhibited a good sensitivity and specificity, with no side effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337466     DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2005.08.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  11 in total

Review 1.  Food allergy in gastroenterologic diseases: Review of literature.

Authors:  Pasquale Mansueto; Giuseppe Montalto; Maria-Luisa Pacor; Maria Esposito-Pellitteri; Vito Ditta; Claudia Lo Bianco; Stefania-Maria Leto-Barone; Gabriele Di Lorenzo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Food-Related Contact Dermatitis, Contact Urticaria, and Atopy Patch Test with Food.

Authors:  Alexandra Walter; Marlene Seegräber; Andreas Wollenberg
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 3.  Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Antonella Cianferoni; Jonathan Spergel
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 8.667

Review 4.  An allergist's perspective to the evaluation of Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Authors:  Jonathan M Spergel
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 3.043

5.  Intact skin and not stripped skin is crucial for the safety and efficacy of peanut epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) in mice.

Authors:  Lucie Mondoulet; Vincent Dioszeghy; Emilie Puteaux; Mélanie Ligouis; Véronique Dhelft; Franck Letourneur; Christophe Dupont; Pierre-Henri Benhamou
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 5.871

6.  Epicutaneous immunotherapy (EPIT) blocks the allergic esophago-gastro-enteropathy induced by sustained oral exposure to peanuts in sensitized mice.

Authors:  Lucie Mondoulet; Vincent Dioszeghy; Thibaut Larcher; Mélanie Ligouis; Véronique Dhelft; Emilie Puteaux; Yan Cherel; Franck Letourneur; Christophe Dupont; Pierre-Henri Benhamou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Epicutaneous Immunotherapy Compared with Sublingual Immunotherapy in Mice Sensitized to Pollen (Phleum pratense).

Authors:  Lucie Mondoulet; Vincent Dioszeghy; Mélanie Ligouis; Véronique Dhelft; Emilie Puteaux; Christophe Dupont; Pierre-Henri Benhamou
Journal:  ISRN Allergy       Date:  2012-02-02

Review 8.  Epicutaneous Immunotherapy for Aeroallergen and Food Allergy.

Authors:  Gabriela Senti; Seraina von Moos; Thomas M Kündig
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Allergy       Date:  2013-12-17

Review 9.  Wheat allergy: diagnosis and management.

Authors:  Antonella Cianferoni
Journal:  J Asthma Allergy       Date:  2016-01-29

Review 10.  Experimental Models for Studying Food Allergy.

Authors:  Cynthia Kanagaratham; Benjamin F Sallis; Edda Fiebiger
Journal:  Cell Mol Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-06-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.