Literature DB >> 16337294

The functional role of central and peripheral vision in the control of posture.

Andrea Berencsi1, Masami Ishihara, Kuniyasu Imanaka.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to investigate the role of central and peripheral vision (CV and PV) in postural control. In Experiment 1, either the central or peripheral visual field were selectively stimulated using a circular random dot pattern that was either static or alternated at 5 Hz. Center of foot pressure (CoP) was used to examine postural sway during quiet standing under both CV and PV conditions. The results showed that, when the visual stimulus was presented in the periphery, the CoP area decreased and more so in the anterior-posterior (AP) than in the medio-lateral (ML) direction, indicating a characteristic directional specificity. There was no significant difference between the static and dynamic (alternating) conditions. Experiment 2 investigated the directional specificity of body sway found in Experiment 1 by having the trunk either be faced toward the stimulus display or perpendicularly to it, with the head always facing the display. The results showed that the stabilizing effect of peripheral vision was present in the direction of stimulus observation (i.e., the head/gaze direction), irrespective of trunk orientation. This suggested that head/gaze direction toward the stimulus presentation, rather than a biomechanical factor like greater mobility of the ankle joint in AP direction than in ML direction, was essential to postural stability. Experiment 3 further examined whether the stabilizing effect of peripheral vision found in Experiments 1 and 2 was caused because more dots (500) were presented as visual cues to the peripheral visual field than to the central visual field (20 dots) by presenting the same number of dots (20) in both conditions. It was found that, in spite of the equal number of dots, the postural sway amplitudes were larger for the central vision conditions than for the peripheral vision conditions. In conclusion, the present study showed that peripheral rather than central vision contributes to maintaining a stable standing posture, with postural sway being influenced more in the direction of stimulus observation, or head/gaze direction, than in the direction of trunk orientation, which suggests that peripheral vision operates primarily in a viewer-centered frame of reference characterized by the head/gaze direction rather than in a body-centered frame of reference characterized by the anatomical planes of the body.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337294     DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2005.10.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  29 in total

1.  Importance of optic flow for postural stability of male and female young adults.

Authors:  Milena Raffi; Alessandro Piras; Michela Persiani; Salvatore Squatrito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-10-23       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 2.  Hypoxia and standing balance.

Authors:  Mathew I B Debenham; Janelle N Smuin; Tess D A Grantham; Philip N Ainslie; Brian H Dalton
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Effects of ocular dominance and visual input on body sway.

Authors:  Ken Asakawa; Hitoshi Ishikawa; Takushi Kawamorita; Yukiko Fujiyama; Nobuyuki Shoji; Hiroshi Uozato
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  Visuo-oculomotor skills related to the visual demands of sporting environments.

Authors:  Hadrien Ceyte; Alexis Lion; Sébastien Caudron; Philippe Perrin; Gérome C Gauchard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Evaluation of Postural Control in Patients with Glaucoma Using a Virtual Reality Environment.

Authors:  Alberto Diniz-Filho; Erwin R Boer; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Ricardo Y Abe; Nienke van Driel; Zhiyong Yang; Felipe A Medeiros
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 12.079

6.  Postural control in response to an external perturbation: effect of altered proprioceptive information.

Authors:  Sambit Mohapatra; Vennila Krishnan; Alexander S Aruin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-12-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neovascular AMD: an overlooked risk factor for injurious falls.

Authors:  S M Szabo; P A Janssen; K Khan; S R Lord; M J Potter
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2009-07-23       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  Influence of pathologic and simulated visual dysfunctions on the postural system.

Authors:  Michaela Friedrich; Hans-Juergen Grein; Carola Wicher; Juliane Schuetze; Anja Mueller; Andreas Lauenroth; Kuno Hottenrott; Rene Schwesig
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-20       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The effect of visuo-haptic congruency on haptic spatial matching.

Authors:  Amanda L Kaas; Hanneke I van Mier; Johan Lataster; Mirella Fingal; Alexander T Sack
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Static and dynamic postural control in low-vision and normal-vision adults.

Authors:  Mônica S V Tomomitsu; Angelica Castilho Alonso; Eurica Morimoto; Tatiana G Bobbio; Julia M D Greve
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.365

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.