Literature DB >> 16337110

On the neural basis of focused and divided attention.

Katharina Nebel1, Holger Wiese, Philipp Stude, Armin de Greiff, Hans-Christoph Diener, Matthias Keidel.   

Abstract

Concepts of higher attention functions distinguish focused and divided attention. The present study investigated whether these mental abilities are mediated by common or distinct neural substrates. In a first experiment, 19 healthy subjects were examined with functional brain imaging (fMRI) while they attended to either one or both of two simultaneously presented visual information streams and responded to repetitive stimuli. This experiment resembled a typical examination of these mental functions with the single task demanding focused and the dual task conditions requiring divided attention. Both conditions activated a widespread, mainly right-sided network including dorso- and ventrolateral prefrontal structures, superior and inferior parietal cortex, and anterior cingulate gyrus. Under higher cognitive demands of divided attention, activity in these structures was enhanced and left-sided homologues were recruited. In a second experiment investigating another 17 subjects with almost the same paradigm, it was accounted for that in most dual task investigations of focused and divided attention the single tasks are easier to process than their combined presentation. Therefore, the task difficulty of focused attention tasks was increased. Almost the same activity pattern observed during division of attention was now found during focusing attention. Comparing both attentional states matched for task difficulty, differences were found in visual but not in prefrontal or parietal cortex areas. Our results suggest that focused and divided attention depend on largely overlapping neuronal substrates. Differences in activation patterns, especially in prefrontal and parietal areas, may result from unequal demands on executive control due to disparate processing requirements in typical tasks of focused and divided attention: Easier conditions begin with mainly right-sided activity within the attention network. As conditions become more difficult, left-lateralized homologue areas activate.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16337110     DOI: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.09.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  42 in total

1.  The contribution of working memory to divided attention.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Emiliano Macaluso
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Effects of aging on circadian patterns of gene expression in the human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Cho-Yi Chen; Ryan W Logan; Tianzhou Ma; David A Lewis; George C Tseng; Etienne Sibille; Colleen A McClung
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  On how high performers keep cool brains in situations of cognitive overload.

Authors:  Susanne M Jaeggi; Martin Buschkuehl; Alex Etienne; Christoph Ozdoba; Walter J Perrig; Arto C Nirkko
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  Neural sources of performance decline during continuous multitasking.

Authors:  Omar Al-Hashimi; Theodore P Zanto; Adam Gazzaley
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Modifying the brain activation of poor readers during sentence comprehension with extended remedial instruction: a longitudinal study of neuroplasticity.

Authors:  Ann Meyler; Timothy A Keller; Vladimir L Cherkassky; John D E Gabrieli; Marcel Adam Just
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2008-03-25       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  Divided versus selective attention: evidence for common processing mechanisms.

Authors:  Britta Hahn; Frank A Wolkenberg; Thomas J Ross; Carol S Myers; Stephen J Heishman; Dan J Stein; Pradeep K Kurup; Elliot A Stein
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-04-07       Impact factor: 3.252

7.  Staying responsive to the world: modality-specific and -nonspecific contributions to speeded auditory, tactile, and visual stimulus detection.

Authors:  Robert Langner; Thilo Kellermann; Simon B Eickhoff; Frank Boers; Anjan Chatterjee; Klaus Willmes; Walter Sturm
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Directional functional coupling of cerebral rhythms between anterior cingulate and dorsolateral prefrontal areas during rare stimuli: a directed transfer function analysis of human depth EEG signal.

Authors:  Milan Brázdil; Claudio Babiloni; Robert Roman; Pavel Daniel; Martin Bares; Ivan Rektor; Fabrizio Eusebi; Paolo Maria Rossini; Fabrizio Vecchio
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Auditory event-related potentials (P3) and cognitive performance in recreational ecstasy polydrug users: evidence from a 12-month longitudinal study.

Authors:  Susana de Sola; Thais Tarancón; Jordi Peña-Casanova; Josep María Espadaler; Klaus Langohr; Sandra Poudevida; Magí Farré; Antonio Verdejo-García; Rafael de la Torre
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 4.530

10.  Relationships Between Impulsivity, Anxiety, and Risk-Taking and the Neural Correlates of Attention in Adolescents.

Authors:  James W B Elsey; Michael J Crowley; W Einar Mencl; Cheryl M Lacadie; Linda C Mayes; Marc N Potenza
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 2.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.