Literature DB >> 16336310

Mark-release-recapture study to measure dispersal of the mosquito Aedes aegypti in Cairns, Queensland, Australia.

R C Russell1, C E Webb, C R Williams, S A Ritchie.   

Abstract

In Queensland, Australia, in response to isolated cases of dengue infection, larval control of the vector Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) is targeted at breeding sites within 200 m of a case and interior spraying with a pyrethroid adulticide is targeted at premises within 100 m. To ascertain whether these limits are appropriate, we conducted a mark-release-recapture study to measure the dispersal of female Ae. aegypti in the city of Cairns where transmission occurs. Female mosquitoes reared from wild collected eggs were differentially marked with fluorescent dust depending on whether they were to be released blood-fed or non-blood-fed, and a total of 1,948 females was released. A total of 132 sticky ovitraps was set at 64 premises within a 200 m radius and collections of trapped adults were made at 5-15 days post-release. Sixty-seven females (3.4%) were recaptured, with the furthest being caught 200 m from the release point, and the mean distance travelled was 78 m. Overall, 23.1% of the recaptures outside the release site were taken beyond 100 m by day 15. Dispersal was comparable for both blood-fed and non-blood-fed releases. There was a significant tendency for dispersal to be in a north-westerly direction, probably because of the presence of numerous containers and heavy shading by trees in this direction and a busy road to the south of the release point that appeared to inhibit dispersal. The results suggest that adulticiding may have to be extended beyond 100 m if more than 8 days have elapsed since female Ae. aegypti could have fed upon a viraemic dengue case. The study also shows that dispersal is not random, and that it may be possible to maximize vector control by taking into account environmental factors that affect the direction of female mosquito flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16336310     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.2005.00589.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Vet Entomol        ISSN: 0269-283X            Impact factor:   2.739


  63 in total

1.  Changes in the genetic structure of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae) populations in Queensland, Australia, across two seasons: implications for potential mosquito releases.

Authors:  N M Endersby; A A Hoffmann; V L White; S A Ritchie; P H Johnson; A R Weeks
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.278

2.  Road test for genetically modified mosquitoes.

Authors:  Todd Shelly; Don McInnis
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 54.908

3.  Evaluation of a stable isotope method to mark naturally-breeding larval mosquitoes for adult dispersal studies.

Authors:  Gabriel L Hamer; Danielle J Donovan; Rebecca Hood-Nowotny; Michael G Kaufman; Tony L Goldberg; Edward D Walker
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  The use of transcriptional profiles to predict adult mosquito age under field conditions.

Authors:  Peter E Cook; Leon E Hugo; Iñaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe; Craig R Williams; Stephen F Chenoweth; Scott A Ritchie; Peter A Ryan; Brian H Kay; Mark W Blows; Scott L O'Neill
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Distinctive regulatory properties of pyruvate kinase 1 from Aedes aegypti mosquitoes.

Authors:  Natthida Petchampai; Claribel Murillo-Solano; Jun Isoe; Juan C Pizarro; Patricia Y Scaraffia
Journal:  Insect Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2018-12-19       Impact factor: 4.714

6.  Criteria for identifying and evaluating candidate sites for open-field trials of genetically engineered mosquitoes.

Authors:  David M Brown; Luke S Alphey; Andrew McKemey; Camilla Beech; Anthony A James
Journal:  Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.133

7.  Estimation of population size and dispersal of Aedes polynesiensis on Toamaro motu, French Polynesia.

Authors:  David R Mercer; Jerome Marie; Herve Bossin; Marc Faaruia; Albert Tetuanui; Michel Cheong Sang; Stephen L Dobson
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 2.278

8.  Fine-scale landscape genomics helps explain the slow spatial spread of Wolbachia through the Aedes aegypti population in Cairns, Australia.

Authors:  Thomas L Schmidt; Igor Filipović; Ary A Hoffmann; Gordana Rašić
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  Influence of urban landscapes on population dynamics in a short-distance migrant mosquito: evidence for the dengue vector Aedes aegypti.

Authors:  Ryan R Hemme; Clayton L Thomas; Dave D Chadee; David W Severson
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-03-16

10.  Genetic structure of Aedes aegypti in Australia and Vietnam revealed by microsatellite and exon primed intron crossing markers suggests feasibility of local control options.

Authors:  N M Endersby; A A Hoffmann; V L White; S Lowenstein; S Ritchie; P H Johnson; L P Rapley; P A Ryan; V S Nam; N T Yen; P Kittiyapong; A R Weeks
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.278

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.