Literature DB >> 16335122

Apparent metabolizable energy value of meat and bone meal for white pekin ducks.

S A Adedokun1, O Adeola.   

Abstract

Apparent metabolizable energy and AMEn values of 12 samples of meat and bone meal (MBM) were determined using 288 ducks with an average weight of 3.4 kg. Diets were formulated for each of the 12 MBM samples by substituting 0, 5, or 10% MBM in a basal corn-soybean meal diet; corn and soybean meal were adjusted at the same ratio to account for the substitution. Each diet was fed to 8 ducks in individual cages in a metabolism assay that employed a 4-d acclimation period followed by 3 d of excreta collection. The gross energy (GE), CP, crude fat (CF), ash, Ca, and P contents of the MBM samples, on a per kilogram of DM basis, ranged from 3,493 to 4,732 kcal, 496.7 to 619.1 g, 91.1 to 151.2 g, 200.3 to 381.9 g, 54.3 to 145.8 g, and 25.6 to 61.7 g, respectively. The AME and AMEn values of the MBM samples were calculated from the slope of the regression of MBM contribution (in kcal) to AME and AMEn intake, respectively, against the amount (in kg) of MBM in diet. The AME or AMEn of the 12 MBM samples ranged from 1,781 to 3,916 kcal/kg of DM or 1,772 to 3,662 kcal/kg of DM, respectively. The variation in AME was described by the regression equation AME = -7,272 + 5.000 GE (kcal/kg) - 19.43 CP (g/kg) - 29.51 CF (g/kg) - 297.17 P (g/kg) + 106.09 Ca (g/kg) + 17.03 ash (g/kg), with R2 = 0.552 and SD = 753. The corresponding equation for AMEn was = -7,389 + 4.584 GE (kcal/kg) - 16.74 CP (g/kg) - 25.11 CF (g/kg) - 218.24 P (g/kg) + 97.29 Ca (g/kg) + 7.95 ash (g/kg), with R2 = 0.598 and SD = 586. The results reveal that variation in each of the chemical components of MBM alone is not the sole determinant of AME or AMEn value of MBM, but that the interactions among these components influence energy utilization in MBM for ducks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16335122     DOI: 10.1093/ps/84.10.1539

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  6 in total

1.  Digestibility index marker type, but not inclusion level affects apparent digestibility of energy and nitrogen and marker recovery in growing pigs regardless of added oat bran.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Olayiwola Adeola
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Prediction of crude protein digestibility of animal by-product meals for dogs by the protein solubility in pepsin method.

Authors:  Iris M Kawauchi; Nilva K Sakomura; Cristiana F F Pontieri; Aline Rebelato; Thaila C Putarov; Euclides B Malheiros; Márcia de O S Gomes; Carlos Castrillo; Aulus C Carciofi
Journal:  J Nutr Sci       Date:  2014-09-30

3.  Accuracy of predicting metabolizable energy from in vitro digestible energy determined with a computer-controlled simulated digestion system in feed ingredients for ducks.

Authors:  Yuming Wang; Liting Yin; Hu Zhang; Ke Li; Dailin Li; Feng Zhao
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2021-09-08

4.  Short-Term Partial Replacement of Corn and Soybean Meal with High-Fiber or High-Protein Feedstuffs during Metabolizable Energy Assay Influenced Intestinal Histomorphology, Cecal Short-Chain Fatty Acids, and Selected Nutrient Transporters in 21-Day-Old Broiler Chickens.

Authors:  Oluyinka A Olukosi; Iyabo W Oluseyifunmi; Yang Lin; Siara S Zedonek
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-26       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  The correlationship between the metabolizable energy content, chemical composition and color score in different sources of corn DDGS.

Authors:  Yong-Z Jie; Jian-Y Zhang; Li-H Zhao; Qiu-G Ma; Cheng Ji
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-25

6.  Historical flaws in bioassays used to generate metabolizable energy values for poultry feed formulation: a critical review.

Authors:  Shu-Biao Wu; Mingan Choct; Gene Pesti
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 3.352

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.