Literature DB >> 16335082

Regulating the Dutch pharmaceutical market: improving efficiency or controlling costs?

Peter de Wolf1, Werner B F Brouwer, Frans F H Rutten.   

Abstract

In this paper, we describe the Dutch pharmaceutical market, which is heavily regulated by the government. Through the regulation of prices and promoting prudent use, the Dutch government tries to bring down the cost of pharmaceuticals, which increases every year at a higher rate than total health care expenditure. The complex system of regulation, especially aimed at cost containment, is not very effective, particularly with respect to controlling outpatient pharmaceutical expenditure. Moreover, the system has few incentives towards efficiency. Though the market share of generic pharmaceuticals is rapidly growing, pharmaceutical expenditure has not decreased accordingly. The discounts offered by wholesalers of generic products to pharmacists produce private rather than societal gains from generic prescriptions. Dismantling the current regulatory system, boosting competition and efficiency with insurers in a leading role, seems to be the way forward.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16335082     DOI: 10.1002/hpm.819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Plann Manage        ISSN: 0749-6753


  6 in total

Review 1.  The last decade of Italian pharmaceutical policy: instability or consolidation?

Authors:  Giovanni Fattore; Claudio Jommi
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Which preferred providers are really preferred? Effectiveness of insurers' channeling incentives on pharmacy choice.

Authors:  Lieke H H M Boonen; Frederik T Schut; Bas Donkers; Xander Koolman
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2009-02-26

3.  Public funding of pharmaceuticals in The Netherlands: investigating the effect of evidence, process and context on CVZ decision-making.

Authors:  Karin H Cerri; Martin Knapp; Jose-Luis Fernandez
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2013-07-18

Review 4.  Societal values in the allocation of healthcare resources: is it all about the health gain?

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Deborah Marshall; Timothy Caulfield
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 5.  Health technology funding decision-making processes around the world: the same, yet different.

Authors:  Tania Stafinski; Devidas Menon; Donald J Philippon; Christopher McCabe
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Lost productivity in four European countries among patients with rheumatic disorders: are absenteeism and presenteeism transferable?

Authors:  Saskia Knies; Math J J M Candel; Annelies Boonen; Silvia M A A Evers; Andre J H A Ament; Johan L Severens
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 4.981

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.