Literature DB >> 16333791

[Evaluation of multiple trauma victims with 16-row multidetector CT (MDCT): a time analysis].

C M Heyer1, G J Rduch, M Wick, T T Bauer, G Muhr, V Nicolas.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Description and time analysis of a 16-row MDCT protocol in the evaluation of multiple trauma patients considering transport, time of scanning, patient positioning, image reconstruction, and image interpretation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between May and December 2004, 60 multiple trauma patients underwent 16-row MDCT (Sensation, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The protocol included serial scanning of the head, spiral scanning of the cervical spine and contrast-enhanced spiral scanning of the thorax/abdomen with multiplanar reformations (MPR) of the thoracic/lumbar spine and the pelvis. All time intervals including transport, patient positioning, scanning, duration of MPR, total time in the examination room, and time to first and final image interpretation were prospectively evaluated. Furthermore, patient characteristics, trauma profiles, and mortality rates were recorded.
RESULTS: 46 male and 14 female patients (mean age 43.6 years) were enrolled in the study. Time analysis of 16-row MDCT revealed the following results (mean time standard deviation): Emergency room treatment and transport 19.2 +/- 6.7 min, patient positioning 16.5 +/- 6.5 min, scan duration 8.0 +/- 3.3 min, total time in examination room 24.5 +/- 7.2 min, image reconstruction including MPR 32.0 +/- 16.4 min, and time of first (16.4 +/- 4.7 min) and final image interpretation (82.5 +/- 30.4 min). Trauma profiles revealed thoracic injuries in 35/60 patients (58.3 %), head injuries in 23/60 patients (38.3 %), abdominal injuries in 15/60 patients (25.0 %), injuries of the cervical (9/60 patients, 15.0 %), thoracic (12/60 patients, 20.0 %), and lumbar spine (19/60 patients, 31.7 %), pelvic injuries in 13/60 patients (21.7 %), and injuries of extremities in 39/60 patients (65.0 %). The mortality rate was 21.7 %.
CONCLUSION: MDCT provides fast and all-inclusive imaging of multiple trauma patients. With the use of 16-row MDCT technology scanning times of 8 minutes are realistic and first image interpretation can be performed 16 minutes after arrival of the patient in the examination room and 35 minutes after admission in the emergency room, respectively. The duration of all procedures done in the examination room is strongly influenced by positioning maneuvers, whereas final image interpretation depends on image reconstructions including MPR. Beside technical improvements, these circumstances provide the potential to further accelerate the diagnostic process in multiple trauma victims.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16333791     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-858689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rofo        ISSN: 1438-9010


  9 in total

1.  [Emergency room management without conventional radiography?].

Authors:  P Hilbert
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Criteria for the selective use of chest computed tomography in blunt trauma patients.

Authors:  Monique Brink; Jaap Deunk; Helena M Dekker; Michael J R Edwards; Digna R Kool; Arie B van Vugt; Cornelis van Kuijk; Johan G Blickman
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Trauma management incorporating focused assessment with computed tomography in trauma (FACTT) - potential effect on survival.

Authors:  Karl-Georg Kanz; April O Paul; Rolf Lefering; Mike V Kay; Uwe Kreimeier; Ulrich Linsenmaier; Wolf Mutschler; Stefan Huber-Wagner
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2010-05-10

4.  [German trauma centers: level-dependent differences in polytrauma care regarding resources and diagnostic concepts].

Authors:  J Bayer; G Pache; T O Hammer; J Zwingmann; N P Südkamp; P C Strohm
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  MDCT evaluation of injuries after tram accidents in pedestrians.

Authors:  Andre W Demant; Christopher Bangard; Henning Bovenschulte; Emmanouil Skouras; Suzanne E Anderson; Klaus J Lackner
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2009-10-14

6.  Value of coronal reformations in the CT evaluation of acute head trauma.

Authors:  S C Wei; S Ulmer; M H Lev; S R Pomerantz; R G González; J W Henson
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2009-10-01       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Diagnostic significance of rib series in minor thorax trauma compared to plain chest film and computed tomography.

Authors:  Patrick Hoffstetter; Christian Dornia; Stephan Schäfer; Merle Wagner; Lena M Dendl; Christian Stroszczynski; Andreas G Schreyer
Journal:  J Trauma Manag Outcomes       Date:  2014-08-05

8.  The accuracy of FAST in relation to grade of solid organ injuries: a retrospective analysis of 226 trauma patients with liver or splenic lesion.

Authors:  Beat Schnüriger; Joachim Kilz; Daniel Inderbitzin; Miranda Schafer; Ralph Kickuth; Martin Luginbühl; Daniel Candinas; Aristomenis K Exadaktylos; Heinz Zimmermann
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2009-03-26       Impact factor: 1.930

9.  Location of sternal fractures as a possible marker for associated injuries.

Authors:  Max J Scheyerer; Stefan M Zimmermann; Samy Bouaicha; Hans-Peter Simmen; Guido A Wanner; Clément M L Werner
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 1.112

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.