PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of administering increasing activities of (188)Re-4-hexadecyl-1-2,9,9-tetramethyl-4,7-diaza-1,10-decanethiol/lipiodol ((188)Re-HDD/lipiodol) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: The activity levels were increased by 1.1 GBq/step after a 6-week interval without unacceptable adverse events in at least five consecutive patients. Absorbed doses to the various organs were calculated according to the MIRD formalism, based on three gamma-scintigraphic studies. Response was assessed by means of MRI and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-five treatments were carried out in 28 patients. Activities from 4.8 to 7.0 GBq (188)Re-HDD/lipiodol were administered via a transfemoral catheter. The mean absorbed dose to the liver (including tumour) was 7.6+/-2.2, 9.8+/-4.9 and 15.2+/-4.9 Gy for the 4.8-, 5.9- and 7.0-GBq groups, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated at all activity levels. Further escalation of the administered activity was not feasible owing to limitations related to the radiolabelling procedure. Response assessment on MRI showed partial response, stable disease and disease progression in 1, 28 and 2 assessable treatments, respectively. In 8 of 17 treatment sessions with an initially elevated AFP, a reduction ranging from 19% to 97% was observed 6 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Following the intra-arterial administration of 4.8-7.0 GBq (188)Re-HDD/lipiodol in patients with HCC and well-compensated liver cirrhosis, no severe adverse events occurred. Further escalation was not feasible owing to limitations in the radiolabelling procedure.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of administering increasing activities of (188)Re-4-hexadecyl-1-2,9,9-tetramethyl-4,7-diaza-1,10-decanethiol/lipiodol ((188)Re-HDD/lipiodol) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with well-compensated cirrhosis. METHODS: The activity levels were increased by 1.1 GBq/step after a 6-week interval without unacceptable adverse events in at least five consecutive patients. Absorbed doses to the various organs were calculated according to the MIRD formalism, based on three gamma-scintigraphic studies. Response was assessed by means of MRI and alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) monitoring. RESULTS: Thirty-five treatments were carried out in 28 patients. Activities from 4.8 to 7.0 GBq (188)Re-HDD/lipiodol were administered via a transfemoral catheter. The mean absorbed dose to the liver (including tumour) was 7.6+/-2.2, 9.8+/-4.9 and 15.2+/-4.9 Gy for the 4.8-, 5.9- and 7.0-GBq groups, respectively. Treatment was well tolerated at all activity levels. Further escalation of the administered activity was not feasible owing to limitations related to the radiolabelling procedure. Response assessment on MRI showed partial response, stable disease and disease progression in 1, 28 and 2 assessable treatments, respectively. In 8 of 17 treatment sessions with an initially elevated AFP, a reduction ranging from 19% to 97% was observed 6 weeks later. CONCLUSION: Following the intra-arterial administration of 4.8-7.0 GBq (188)Re-HDD/lipiodol in patients with HCC and well-compensated liver cirrhosis, no severe adverse events occurred. Further escalation was not feasible owing to limitations in the radiolabelling procedure.
Authors: J Bruix; M Sherman; J M Llovet; M Beaugrand; R Lencioni; A K Burroughs; E Christensen; L Pagliaro; M Colombo; J Rodés Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: J H Risse; F Grünwald; W Kersjes; H Strunk; W H Caselmann; H Palmedo; H Bender; H J Biersack Journal: Cancer Biother Radiopharm Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 3.099
Authors: B Brans; K Bacher; V Vandevyver; P Vanlangenhove; P Smeets; H Thierens; R A Dierckx; L Defreyne Journal: Nucl Med Commun Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 1.690
Authors: E Garin; N Noiret; C Malbert; N Lepareur; A Roucoux; S Caulet-Maugendre; A Moisan; J Lecloirec; J Y Herry; P Bourguet Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2003-12-23 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Kostas Delaunay; Julien Edeline; Yan Rolland; Nicolas Lepareur; Sophie Laffont; Xavier Palard; Christelle Bouvry; Samuel Le Sourd; Marc Pracht; Valérie Ardisson; Nicolas Noiret; Éric Bellissant; Etienne Garin Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-02-04 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Mirosław L Nowicki; Jarosław B Cwikla; Artur J Sankowski; Sergey Shcherbinin; Josh Grimmes; Anna Celler; John R Buscombe; Andrzej Bator; Maciej Pech; Renata Mikołajczak; Dariusz Pawlak Journal: Med Sci Monit Date: 2014-08-02