Literature DB >> 16332753

Planktonic-cell yield of a pseudomonad biofilm.

Elanna Bester1, Gideon Wolfaardt, Lydia Joubert, Kerstin Garny, Sanja Saftic.   

Abstract

Biofilm cells differ phenotypically from their free-floating counterparts. Differential growth rates in biofilms are often referred to, particularly in response to limited diffusion of oxygen and nutrients. We observed growth rates of attached Pseudomonas sp. strain CT07 cells that were notably higher than the maximum specific growth rate measured in batch culture. Despite dilution rates in continuous flow cells that exceeded the maximum planktonic specific growth rate by 58 times, sampling of the effluent revealed >10(9) cells ml(-1), suggesting that biofilms function as a source of planktonic cells through high cell yield and detachment. Further investigation demonstrated considerable planktonic cell yield from biofilms as young as 6 h, indicating that detachment is not limited to established biofilms. These biofilm-detached cells were more sensitive to a commercial biocide than associated biofilm- and chemostat-cultivated populations, implying that detached biofilm cells exhibit a character that is distinct from that of attached and planktonic cell populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332753      PMCID: PMC1317325          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.12.7792-7798.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  25 in total

Review 1.  Genetic analyses of bacterial biofilm formation.

Authors:  L A Pratt; R Kolter
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.934

Review 2.  Biofilm formation as microbial development.

Authors:  G O'Toole; H B Kaplan; R Kolter
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

3.  Reproducibility of biofilm processes and the meaning of steady state in biofilm reactors.

Authors:  Z Lewandowski; H Beyenal; D Stookey
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.915

4.  Effects of biofilm structures on oxygen distribution and mass transport.

Authors:  D de Beer; P Stoodley; F Roe; Z Lewandowski
Journal:  Biotechnol Bioeng       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm.

Authors:  Karin Sauer; Anne K Camper; Garth D Ehrlich; J William Costerton; David G Davies
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.490

6.  Possible involvement of the division cycle in dispersal of Escherichia coli from biofilms.

Authors:  D G Allison; D J Evans; M R Brown; P Gilbert
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.490

7.  Measurement of bacterial growth rates on polymers.

Authors:  A J Barton; R D Sagers; W G Pitt
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1996-10

Review 8.  Biofilms, the customized microniche.

Authors:  J W Costerton; Z Lewandowski; D DeBeer; D Caldwell; D Korber; G James
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 3.490

9.  Initial adhesion and surface growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biomedical polymers.

Authors:  B Gottenbos; H C van der Mei; H J Busscher
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  2000-05

10.  The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm.

Authors:  D G Davies; M R Parsek; J P Pearson; B H Iglewski; J W Costerton; E P Greenberg
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-04-10       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  16 in total

1.  Pronounced effect of the nature of the inoculum on biofilm development in flow systems.

Authors:  Otini Kroukamp; Romeo G Dumitrache; Gideon M Wolfaardt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Live-streaming: Time-lapse video evidence of novel streamer formation mechanism and varying viscosity.

Authors:  Mazeyar Parvinzadeh Gashti; Julien Bellavance; Otini Kroukamp; Gideon Wolfaardt; Seyed Mohammad Taghavi; Jesse Greener
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.800

3.  Microbial exopolymers link predator and prey in a model yeast biofilm system.

Authors:  L-M Joubert; G M Wolfaardt; A Botha
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2006-08-08       Impact factor: 4.552

4.  A microfluidic method and custom model for continuous, non-intrusive biofilm viscosity measurements under different nutrient conditions.

Authors:  J Greener; M Parvinzadeh Gashti; A Eslami; M P Zarabadi; S M Taghavi
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 2.800

5.  Metabolic differentiation in biofilms as indicated by carbon dioxide production rates.

Authors:  Elanna Bester; Otini Kroukamp; Gideon M Wolfaardt; Leandro Boonzaaier; Steven N Liss
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Comparison of planktonic and biofilm cultures of Pseudomonas fluorescens DSM 8341 cells grown on fluoroacetate.

Authors:  Barry Heffernan; Cormac D Murphy; Eoin Casey
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-13       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Integration and proliferation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA01 in multispecies biofilms.

Authors:  Mahtab Ghadakpour; Elanna Bester; Steven N Liss; Michael Gardam; Ian Droppo; S Hota; Gideon M Wolfaardt
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2014-03-01       Impact factor: 4.552

8.  Role of rpoS in Escherichia coli O157:H7 strain H32 biofilm development and survival.

Authors:  Jessica R Sheldon; Mi-Sung Yim; Jessica H Saliba; Wai-Hong Chung; Kwok-Yin Wong; Kam Tin Leung
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  The influence of bacterial biofilm on the clinical outcome of chronic rhinosinusitis: a prospective, double-blind, scanning electron microscopy study.

Authors:  Roman Głowacki; Krzysztof A Tomaszewski; Paweł Stręk; Iwona M Tomaszewska; Katarzyna Zgórska-Świerzy; Beata Markiewicz; Jacek Składzień
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 2.503

10.  CO2 production as an indicator of biofilm metabolism.

Authors:  Otini Kroukamp; Gideon M Wolfaardt
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 4.792

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.