Literature DB >> 16332559

Comparison of opinions and profiles of late or non-responding medical students with initial responders to a course evaluation questionnaire.

Joy R Rudland1, Martin J Pippard, Sarah C Rennie.   

Abstract

This study examined whether students requiring prompting to evaluate an educational module differed from initial responders in their rating of the experience and their profile (academic ability, age and gender). At the end of a 4th year induction Module, medical students completed an evaluation questionnaire. Those who did not respond were followed-up. Fifty-nine percent responded immediately, 34% after first or second prompts (late responders) and 7% were non-responders. Late responders rated the module significantly lower than initial responders. Late and non-responders were academically weaker than initial responders, but were similar in age and gender. Academically weaker students in the non- or late responders groups, may be less willing to reflect on their experience, and may require new strategies to encourage a response.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332559     DOI: 10.1080/01421590500136287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Teach        ISSN: 0142-159X            Impact factor:   3.650


  4 in total

1.  Measuring learning from the TRC pharmacology E-Learning program.

Authors:  Kari L Franson; Eline A Dubois; Marieke L de Kam; Adam F Cohen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 4.335

2.  Rapid Feedback: Assessing Pre-clinical Teaching in the Era of Online Learning.

Authors:  Daniel Walden; Meagan Rawls; Sally A Santen; Moshe Feldman; Anna Vinnikova; Alan Dow
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2022-06-15

3.  Making medical student course evaluations meaningful: implementation of an intensive course review protocol.

Authors:  Patrick Fleming; Olga Heath; Alan Goodridge; Vernon Curran
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 2.463

4.  Curriculum factors influencing knowledge of communication skills among medical students.

Authors:  Anders Baerheim; Per Hjortdahl; Are Holen; Tor Anvik; Ole Bernt Fasmer; Hilde Grimstad; Tore Gude; Terje Risberg; Per Vaglum
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 2.463

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.