Literature DB >> 16332409

Open retropubic nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy.

Markus Graefen1, Jochen Walz, Hartwig Huland.   

Abstract

Retropubic radical prostatectomy is the most commonly used therapeutic option for the treatment of clinically localized prostate cancer. An ongoing stage migration toward organ-confined cancers allows performance of a nerve-sparing procedure in a growing number of patients. Key elements for achieving convincing functional results are a sphincter-preserving ligation of the distal part of the Santorini plexus and the subtle preparation of the neurovascular bundle. This article gives a detailed description of the operative technique, which is demonstrated in the attached DVD. Furthermore, indication, oncologic outcome, and functional results addressing postoperative urinary continence and potency are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332409     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2005.10.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  34 in total

Review 1.  Basic principles of anatomy for optimal surgical treatment of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jochen Walz; Markus Graefen; Hartwig Huland
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 2.  Oncological and functional results of open, robot-assisted and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: does surgical approach and surgical experience matter?

Authors:  T R Herrmann; R Rabenalt; J U Stolzenburg; E N Liatsikos; F Imkamp; H Tezval; A J Gross; U Jonas; M Burchardt
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [Robotic laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: update 2008].

Authors:  H John
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  Surgical Management of Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer with Review of Literature and Evolving Evidence.

Authors:  Ahmed Saeed Goolam; Alfredo Harb-De la Rosa; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-13

5.  Complications of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Boris Fischer; Nadja Engel; Jean-Luc Fehr; Hubert John
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2008-06-27       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Do we need the nerve sparing radical prostatectomy techniques (intrafascial vs. interfascial) in men with erectile dysfunction? Results of a single-centre study.

Authors:  Wael Y Khoder; Raphaela Waidelich; Michael Seitz; Armin J Becker; Alexander Buchner; Stefan Trittschler; Christian G Stief
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  [Brachytherapy of the prostate cancer].

Authors:  S H Stübinger; R Wilhelm; S Kaufmann; M Döring; S Hautmann; K P Jünemann; R Galalae
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.639

8.  Neuroanatomical study of periprostatic nerve distributions using human cadaver prostate.

Authors:  Wooseuk Sung; Sun Lee; Yong-Koo Park; Sung-Goo Chang
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  The incidence and anatomy of accessory pudendal arteries as depicted on multidetector-row CT angiography: clinical implications of preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic and robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Beom Jin Park; Deuk Jae Sung; Min Ju Kim; Sung Bum Cho; Yun Hwan Kim; Kyoo Byung Chung; Seok Ho Kang; Jun Cheon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.500

10.  Modified technique for neurovascular bundle preservation during radical prostatectomy: association between technique and recovery of erectile function.

Authors:  Timothy A Masterson; Angel M Serio; John P Mulhall; Andrew J Vickers; James A Eastham
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2008-02-15       Impact factor: 5.588

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.