Literature DB >> 16332276

Stimulus size and intensity alter fundamental receptive-field properties of mouse retinal ganglion cells in vivo.

Botir T Sagdullaev1, Maureen A McCall.   

Abstract

The receptive field (RF) of most retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) is comprised of an excitatory center and an antagonistic surround. Interactions between these RF elements shape most of the visual responses of RGCs. To begin to investigate center-surround interactions of mouse RGCs quantitatively, we characterized their responses in an in vivo preparation to a variety of spot and full-field stimuli. When RGCs were stimulated with a spot that matched the cell's RF center diameter (optimal spot), all RGCs could be categorized as either ON- or OFF-center. In all RGCs, full-field stimulation significantly reduced both the peak and the mean firing rates evoked with an optimal spot stimulus. Full-field stimulation revealed differences in other response properties between ON- and OFF-center RGCs. With a full-field stimulus, the duration of the OFF-center RGCs response was reduced making them more transient, while the duration of the ON-center RGCs increased making them more sustained. Of most interest, full-field stimulation altered the RF center response sign in approximately half of the OFF-center RGCs, which became either OFF/ON or ON only. In contrast, all ON-center and the other OFF-center cells conserved their RF response sign in the presence of the full-field stimulus. We propose that sign-altering OFF-center RGCs possess an additional RF surround mechanism that underlies this alteration in their response. Of general interest these results suggest that the sole use of full-field stimulation to categorize visual response properties of RGCs does not adequately reflect their RF organization and, therefore, is not an optimal strategy for their classification.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16332276     DOI: 10.1017/S0952523805225142

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  48 in total

1.  Different mechanisms generate maintained activity in ON and OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Peter B Detwiler
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Interacting linear and nonlinear characteristics produce population coding asymmetries between ON and OFF cells in the retina.

Authors:  Zachary Nichols; Sheila Nirenberg; Jonathan Victor
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Asymmetric ON-OFF processing of visual motion cancels variability induced by the structure of natural scenes.

Authors:  James E Fitzgerald; Damon A Clark; Juyue Chen; Holly B Mandel
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 8.140

4.  Interneuron circuits tune inhibition in retinal bipolar cells.

Authors:  Erika D Eggers; Peter D Lukasiewicz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Masked excitatory crosstalk between the ON and OFF visual pathways in the mammalian retina.

Authors:  Reza Farajian; Feng Pan; Abram Akopian; Béla Völgyi; Stewart A Bloomfield
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Ambient illumination switches contrast preference of specific retinal processing streams.

Authors:  James T Pearson; Daniel Kerschensteiner
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Change the neural code, change the message.

Authors:  Maarten Kamermans
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Cell type-specific changes in retinal ganglion cell function induced by rod death and cone reorganization in rats.

Authors:  Wan-Qing Yu; Norberto M Grzywacz; Eun-Jin Lee; Greg D Field
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Imaging light responses of retinal ganglion cells in the living mouse eye.

Authors:  Lu Yin; Ying Geng; Fumitaka Osakada; Robin Sharma; Ali H Cetin; Edward M Callaway; David R Williams; William H Merigan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Cone inputs to murine striate cortex.

Authors:  Björn Ekesten; Peter Gouras
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-14       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.