Literature DB >> 16332225

Assessing risks of releasing exotic biological control agents of arthropod pests.

J C van Lenteren1, J Bale, F Bigler, H M T Hokkanen, A J M Loomans.   

Abstract

More than 5000 introductions of about 2000 species of exotic arthropod agents for control of arthropod pests in 196 countries or islands during the past 120 years rarely have resulted in negative environmental effects. Yet, risks of environmental effects caused by releases of exotics are of growing concern. Twenty countries have implemented regulations for release of biological control agents. Soon, the International Standard for Phytosanitary Measures (ISPM3) will become the standard for all biological control introductions worldwide, but this standard does not provide methods by which to assess environmental risks. This review summarizes documented nontarget effects and discusses the development and application of comprehensive and quick-scan environmental risk assessment methods.

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16332225     DOI： 10.1146/annurev.ento.51.110104.151129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Entomol        ISSN： 0066-4170            Impact factor:   19.686


  37 in total

Review 1.  Can exotic phytoseiids be considered 'benevolent invaders' in perennial cropping systems?

Authors:  Eric Palevsky; Uri Gerson; Zhi-Qiang Zhang
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.132

Review 2.  Biological control and sustainable food production.

Authors:  J S Bale; J C van Lenteren; F Bigler
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Biotic interactions, ecological knowledge and agriculture.

Authors:  Carol Shennan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  The impact of exotic parasitoids on populations of a native Hawaiian moth assessed using life table studies.

Authors:  Leyla V Kaufman; Mark G Wright
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 5.  Review: biosafety assessment of Bt rice and other Bt crops using spiders as example for non-target arthropods in China.

Authors:  Huilin Yang; Yuande Peng; Jianxiang Tian; Juan Wang; Jilin Hu; Qisheng Song; Zhi Wang
Journal:  Plant Cell Rep       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.570

6.  Comparison of thermal activity thresholds of the spider mite predators Phytoseiulus macropilis and Phytoseiulus persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae).

Authors:  Megan R Coombs; Jeffrey S Bale
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.132

7.  Risk assessment of non-target effects caused by releasing two exotic phytoseiid mites in Japan: can an indigenous phytoseiid mite become IG prey?

Authors:  Yukie Sato; Atsushi Mochizuki
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 2.132

8.  Niche Modeling May Explain the Historical Population Failure of Phytoseiulus persimilis in Taiwan: Implications of Biocontrol Strategies.

Authors:  Jhih-Rong Liao; Chyi-Chen Ho; Ming-Chih Chiu; Chiung-Cheng Ko
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.769

9.  Irradiation-induced sterility in an egg parasitoid and possible implications for the use of biological control in insect eradication.

Authors:  Kiran Jonathan Horrocks; Gonzalo Andres Avila; Gregory Ian Holwell; David Maxwell Suckling
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Intraspecific variability in the parasitoid wasp Trichogramma chilonis: can we predict the outcome of hybridization?

Authors:  Chiara Benvenuto; Elisabeth Tabone; Elodie Vercken; Nathalie Sorbier; Etty Colombel; Sylvie Warot; Xavier Fauvergue; Nicolas Ris
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.183
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.