Literature DB >> 16331770

Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures.

Ann B Cranney1, Douglas Coyle, Wilma M Hopman, Valerie Hum, Barbara Power, Peter S Tugwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hip fractures are a major cause of morbidity for older women, which result in impaired health related quality of life (HRQOL). Few studies have prospectively evaluated the effect of hip fractures in women on HRQOL with different health state preference measures. We compared how 4 different preference measures change in women post-hip fracture and evaluated the responsiveness of the preference measures. We also compared HRQOL in women with recent hip fractures to a control sample at baseline and to normative Canadian data at followup.
METHODS: Health status measures [the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36)] and preferences (direct and indirect) of women over age 50 years with hip fractures were measured at baseline and at 3 and 9 months. Baseline preferences [Health Utilities Index (HUI), Feeling Thermometer, Standard Gamble, and SF-36] were obtained from women without hip fractures for comparison. Independent sample t tests were used to compare baseline scores of fracture and nonfracture controls. Correlations between preference and health status measures were assessed and repeated measures ANOVA was used to assess change in health status and preferences over time.
RESULTS: Health status and preference measures were lower in women with hip fractures in comparison to nonfracture controls. After 9 months, the SF-36, HUI, Feeling Thermometer, and SF-6D scores improved significantly. Values for the SF-36 remained lower than an age-matched normative sample. The HUI and SF-6D were sensitive to change over time, but the Standard Gamble was not.
CONCLUSION: HRQOL and preference measures improve over time in women with recent hip fractures, with the majority of the change occurring in the initial 3 months. Our results suggest that the HUI and SF-6D are valid measures to assess change over time post-hip fracture.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331770

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rheumatol        ISSN: 0315-162X            Impact factor:   4.666


  13 in total

1.  Longitudinal construct validity of the Health Utilities Indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in hip fracture.

Authors:  C Allyson Jones; Sheri L Pohar; David H Feeny; Ken Eng
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Nutritional supplementation for hip fracture aftercare in older people.

Authors:  Alison Avenell; Toby O Smith; James P Curtain; Jenson Cs Mak; Phyo K Myint
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-11-30

3.  Quality of life of the elderly after hip fracture surgery: a case-control study.

Authors:  Mohsen Adib Hajbaghery; Mohammad Abbasinia
Journal:  J Caring Sci       Date:  2013-02-26

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability.

Authors:  K L Haywood; J Brett; E Tutton; S Staniszewska
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-10-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Comparison of scores derived from the box score-11 scale and the pain attribute of the health utilities index-3.

Authors:  Michael Iskedjian; Barbara Jaszewski; Olivier Desjardins
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Sequential change in quality of life for patients with incident clinical fractures: a prospective study.

Authors:  H Hagino; T Nakamura; S Fujiwara; M Oeki; T Okano; R Teshima
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Social support for exercise by experts in older women post-hip fracture.

Authors:  Banghwa Lee Casado; Barbara Resnick; Sheryl Zimmerman; Eun-Shim Nahm; Denise Orwig; Kelley Macmillan; Jay Magaziner
Journal:  J Women Aging       Date:  2009

8.  Osteoporosis treatment rate following hip fracture in a community hospital.

Authors:  Aliya A Khan; Hajar AbuAlrob; Farhan Tariq; Madiha Tauqir; Paul Zalzal; Iman M'Hiri; Moin Khan; Mark Ginty; Brad Weening
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.617

9.  An economic evaluation: Simulation of the cost-effectiveness and cost-utility of universal prevention strategies against osteoporosis-related fractures.

Authors:  Léon Nshimyumukiza; Audrey Durand; Mathieu Gagnon; Xavier Douville; Suzanne Morin; Carmen Lindsay; Julie Duplantie; Christian Gagné; Sonia Jean; Yves Giguère; Sylvie Dodin; François Rousseau; Daniel Reinharz
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Scoping review of potential quality indicators for hip fracture patient care.

Authors:  Kristen B Pitzul; Sarah E P Munce; Laure Perrier; Lauren Beaupre; Suzanne N Morin; Rhona McGlasson; Susan B Jaglal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.