Literature DB >> 16331405

The centroidal algorithm in molecular similarity and diversity calculations on confidential datasets.

Sergey Trepalin1, Nikolay Osadchiy.   

Abstract

Chemical structure provides exhaustive description of a compound, but it is often proprietary and thus an impediment in the exchange of information. For example, structure disclosure is often needed for the selection of most similar or dissimilar compounds. Authors propose a centroidal algorithm based on structural fragments (screens) that can be efficiently used for the similarity and diversity selections without disclosing structures from the reference set. For an increased security purposes, authors recommend that such set contains at least some tens of structures. Analysis of reverse engineering feasibility showed that the problem difficulty grows with decrease of the screen's radius. The algorithm is illustrated with concrete calculations on known steroidal, quinoline, and quinazoline drugs. We also investigate a problem of scaffold identification in combinatorial library dataset. The results show that relatively small screens of radius equal to 2 bond lengths perform well in the similarity sorting, while radius 4 screens yield better results in diversity sorting. The software implementation of the algorithm taking SDF file with a reference set generates screens of various radii which are subsequently used for the similarity and diversity sorting of external SDFs. Since the reverse engineering of the reference set molecules from their screens has the same difficulty as the RSA asymmetric encryption algorithm, generated screens can be stored openly without further encryption. This approach ensures an end user transfers only a set of structural fragments and no other data. Like other algorithms of encryption, the centroid algorithm cannot give 100% guarantee of protecting a chemical structure from dataset, but probability of initial structure identification is very small-order of 10(-40) in typical cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16331405     DOI: 10.1007/s10822-005-9023-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des        ISSN: 0920-654X            Impact factor:   3.686


  5 in total

1.  Evaluation of a (1)h-(13)c NMR spectral library.

Authors:  S K Smith; J Cobleigh; V Svetnik
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec

2.  New diversity calculations algorithms used for compound selection.

Authors:  Sergei V Trepalin; Vadim A Gerasimenko; Andrey V Kozyukov; Nikolay Ph Savchuk; Andrey A Ivaschenko
Journal:  J Chem Inf Comput Sci       Date:  2002 Mar-Apr

3.  IcePick: a flexible surface-based system for molecular diversity.

Authors:  J Mount; J Ruppert; W Welch; A N Jain
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1999-01-14       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Neighborhood behavior: a useful concept for validation of "molecular diversity" descriptors.

Authors:  D E Patterson; R D Cramer; A M Ferguson; R D Clark; L E Weinberger
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1996-08-02       Impact factor: 7.446

5.  Selecting optimally diverse compounds from structure databases: a validation study of two-dimensional and three-dimensional molecular descriptors.

Authors:  H Matter
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  1997-04-11       Impact factor: 7.446

  5 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The importance of discerning shape in molecular pharmacology.

Authors:  Sandhya Kortagere; Matthew D Krasowski; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Trends Pharmacol Sci       Date:  2009-01-31       Impact factor: 14.819

2.  Bigger data, collaborative tools and the future of predictive drug discovery.

Authors:  Sean Ekins; Alex M Clark; S Joshua Swamidass; Nadia Litterman; Antony J Williams
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2014-06-19       Impact factor: 3.686

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.