OBJECTIVE: Delayed repair of peripheral nerve injuries often results in poor motor functional recovery. This may be a result of the deterioration or loss of endoneurial pathways in the distal nerve stump before motor axons can regenerate into the stump. METHODS: Using the rat femoral nerve, we protected distal endoneurial pathways of the saphenous nerve with either cross-suture of the quadriceps motor nerve (Group A) or resuture of the saphenous nerve (Group B) to compare later motor regeneration into the "protected" saphenous nerve pathway to chronic denervation and "unprotected" saphenous nerve (Group C). A total of 60 rats, 20 per group, were operated on. After this protection (or lack thereof) for 8 weeks, the motor branch of the femoral nerve was cut and sutured to the distal saphenous nerve to allow motor regeneration into protected and unprotected saphenous nerve stumps. The quantitative assessment of axonal regeneration was performed after 6 weeks by use of nerve sampling for axon counts and retrogradely labeled motor neuron counts. RESULTS: Significantly more myelinated axons innervated the motor (A) than the sensory (B) and no-protection (C) groups. There were significantly more retrogradely labeled femoral motor neurons in Group A than in the unprotected group (C). CONCLUSION: We conclude that even 2 months of denervation of the distal nerve pathway is deleterious to regeneration and that protection of the pathway improves subsequent reinnervation and regeneration. Moreover, if the desired regeneration is motor, protection of the distal nerve pathway by a motor nerve conditions is better than a sensory nerve.
OBJECTIVE: Delayed repair of peripheral nerve injuries often results in poor motor functional recovery. This may be a result of the deterioration or loss of endoneurial pathways in the distal nerve stump before motor axons can regenerate into the stump. METHODS: Using the rat femoral nerve, we protected distal endoneurial pathways of the saphenous nerve with either cross-suture of the quadriceps motor nerve (Group A) or resuture of the saphenous nerve (Group B) to compare later motor regeneration into the "protected" saphenous nerve pathway to chronic denervation and "unprotected" saphenous nerve (Group C). A total of 60 rats, 20 per group, were operated on. After this protection (or lack thereof) for 8 weeks, the motor branch of the femoral nerve was cut and sutured to the distal saphenous nerve to allow motor regeneration into protected and unprotected saphenous nerve stumps. The quantitative assessment of axonal regeneration was performed after 6 weeks by use of nerve sampling for axon counts and retrogradely labeled motor neuron counts. RESULTS: Significantly more myelinated axons innervated the motor (A) than the sensory (B) and no-protection (C) groups. There were significantly more retrogradely labeled femoral motor neurons in Group A than in the unprotected group (C). CONCLUSION: We conclude that even 2 months of denervation of the distal nerve pathway is deleterious to regeneration and that protection of the pathway improves subsequent reinnervation and regeneration. Moreover, if the desired regeneration is motor, protection of the distal nerve pathway by a motor nerve conditions is better than a sensory nerve.
Authors: Gigi J Ebenezer; Victoria A Laast; Brandon Dearman; Peter Hauer; Patrick M Tarwater; Robert J Adams; M Christine Zink; Justin C McArthur; Joseph L Mankowski Journal: J Comp Neurol Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 3.215
Authors: Emilija Žygelytė; Megan E Bernard; Joy E Tomlinson; Matthew J Martin; Allegra Terhorst; Harriet E Bradford; Sarah A Lundquist; Michael Sledziona; Jonathan Cheetham Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2016-06-03 Impact factor: 2.390