Literature DB >> 16329896

Methanogenic symbionts of anaerobic ciliates and their contribution to methanogenesis in an anoxic rice field soil.

M V Julian Schwarz1, Peter Frenzel.   

Abstract

Methanogenesis in rice field soils starts soon after flooding while potentially competing processes like reduction of sulphate and iron take place. Early methanogenesis is mainly driven by hydrogen, while later in the season acetate tends to become more important. Anaerobic ciliates are abundant during this period, and their endosymbionts use hydrogen produced by the ciliates to reduce carbon dioxide to methane. These endosymbiotic methanogens are protected from the competition for substrates with other bacteria that may control methanogenesis outside the protozoan cells. Thus, we focussed on early methanogenesis and on the potential contribution from ciliates and their endosymbionts. Only ciliates of the genus Metopus were found to harbour methanogens, as identified by the F(420)-fluorescence of the endosymbionts. We followed the population dynamics of the ciliates with time, and calculated the ratio of symbiotic methane production to overall methanogenesis. Symbiotic methane production was calculated from the species-specific numbers of methanogenic endosymbionts times the cell-specific methane production of the symbionts. According to this calculation, the symbionts' contribution to overall methane production was only 6.4% at the beginning and decreased with time. In a second experiment, colchicine and cycloheximide were used to inhibit all eukaryotes, comparing the remaining methane production rate to a control without inhibitors. In the inhibition experiment, the contribution from symbionts decreased from 40% to 6% during the first days after flooding, and dropped to near zero within 2 weeks. However, nearly all methane produced from H(2)/CO(2) could be attributed to the ciliates' symbionts between days 5 and 10 after flooding. Both experiments showed that the contribution of methanogenic symbionts to overall methane production is a transient phenomenon, restricted to the first 2 weeks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 16329896     DOI: 10.1016/j.femsec.2004.10.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  5 in total

1.  The impact of simulated sulfate deposition on peatland testate amoebae.

Authors:  Richard Payne; Vincent Gauci; Dan J Charman
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 4.552

2.  Impact of protists on the activity and structure of the bacterial community in a rice field soil.

Authors:  Jun Murase; Matthias Noll; Peter Frenzel
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Archaeal communities associated with roots of the common reed (Phragmites australis) in Beijing Cuihu Wetland.

Authors:  Yin Liu; Hong Li; Qun Fang Liu; Yan Hong Li
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Methane production from protozoan endosymbionts following stimulation of microbial metabolism within subsurface sediments.

Authors:  Dawn E Holmes; Ludovic Giloteaux; Roberto Orellana; Kenneth H Williams; Mark J Robbins; Derek R Lovley
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Effects of Predation by Protists on Prokaryotic Community Function, Structure, and Diversity in Anaerobic Granular Sludge.

Authors:  Yuga Hirakata; Mamoru Oshiki; Kyohei Kuroda; Masashi Hatamoto; Kengo Kubota; Takashi Yamaguchi; Hideki Harada; Nobuo Araki
Journal:  Microbes Environ       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 2.912

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.