| Literature DB >> 16329779 |
Cameron R Dale Bass1, Cameron Dale Bass, Martin Davis, Karin Rafaels, Mark Steve Rountree, Robert M Harris, Ellory Sanderson, Walter Andrefsky, Gina DiMarco, Michael Zielinski.
Abstract
To reduce human casualties associated with explosive ordnance disposal, a wide range of protective wear has been designed to shield against the blast effects of improvised explosive devices and munitions. In this study, 4 commercially available bomb suits, representing a range of materials and armor masses, were evaluated against 0.227 and 0.567 kg of spherical C-4 explosives to determine the level of protection offered to the head, neck, and thorax. A Hybrid III dummy, an instrumented human surrogate [1], was tested with and without protection from the 4 commercially available bomb suits. 20 tests with the dummy torso mounted to simulate a kneeling position were performed to confirm repeatability and robustness of the dummies, as well as to evaluate the 4 suits. Correlations between injury risk assessments based on past human or animal injury model data and various parameters such as bomb suit mass, projected area, and dummy coverage area were drawn.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2005 PMID: 16329779 DOI: 10.1080/10803548.2005.11076655
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Occup Saf Ergon ISSN: 1080-3548