Literature DB >> 16329015

Indigo carmine-assisted high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy for the detection and characterisation of intraepithelial neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: a prospective evaluation.

D P Hurlstone1, D S Sanders, A J Lobo, M E McAlindon, S S Cross.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Recent data suggest that panchromoscopy using methylene blue can improve the detection of intraepithelial neoplastic lesions in the context of surveillance colonoscopy for patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. This method has also been shown to provide a more accurate diagnosis of the extent of disease and inflammatory activity. Interval cancers are known to occur in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis despite the adoption of currently accepted surveillance biopsy protocols. We hypothesised that targeted chromoscopy alone, with high-magnification imaging, may increase the total number of intraepithelial neoplastic lesions detected, compared with conventional colonoscopy and biopsy surveillance according to current protocols. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 350 patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis (>or=8 years) underwent surveillance colonoscopy using high-magnification chromoscopic colonoscopy (HMCC). Quadrantic biopsies at 10-cm intervals were taken on extubation in addition to targeted biopsies of abnormal mucosal areas. Defined lesions were further evaluated using modified Kudo crypt pattern analysis. These data were compared with data from 350 disease duration- and disease extent-matched control patients who had undergone conventional colonoscopic surveillance between January 2001 and April 2005.
RESULTS: Significantly more intraepithelial neoplastic lesions were detected in the magnification chromoscopy group compared with controls (69 vs. 24, P<0.0001). Intraepithelial neoplasia was observed in 67 lesions, of which 53 (79%) were detected using magnification chromoscopy alone. Chromoscopy increased the number of flat lesions with intraepithelial neoplasia detected compared with controls (P<0.001). Twenty intraepithelial neoplastic lesions were detected from 12,850 non-targeted biopsies in the HMCC group (0.16%), while 49 intraepithelial neoplastic lesions were detected from the 644 targeted biopsies in the HMCC group (8%). From 12,482 non-targeted biopsies taken in the control group patients, 18 (0.14%) showed intraepithelial neoplasia. The yield of intraepithelial neoplastic lesions from targeted biopsies in the control group (i. e. without HMCC imaging), however, was only modestly improved at 1.6% (6/369). Using modified Kudo criteria, the sensitivity and specificity for differentiating neoplastic from non-neoplastic lesions using HMCC were 93% and 88% respectively. The total procedure time was significantly longer in the HMCC group compared with controls (P<0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Magnification chromoscopy improves the detection of intraepithelial neoplasia in the endoscopic screening of patients with chronic ulcerative colitis. Neoplastic and non-neoplastic mucosal change can be predicted with a high overall accuracy using magnification techniques. These adjunctive endoscopic techniques have important clinical implications and may lead to changes in current practice guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16329015     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-921032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  51 in total

1.  Target biopsy or step biopsy? Optimal surveillance for ulcerative colitis: a Japanese nationwide randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Toshiaki Watanabe; Yoichi Ajioka; Takayuki Matsumoto; Naoki Tomotsugu; Toru Takebayashi; Eisuke Inoue; Bunei Iizuka; Masahiro Igarashi; Yasushi Iwao; Kazuo Ohtsuka; Shin-ei Kudo; Kiyonori Kobayashi; Miwa Sada; Takayuki Matsumoto; Ichiro Hirata; Kazunari Murakami; Masakazu Nagahori; Kenji Watanabe; Nobuyuki Hida; Fumiaki Ueno; Shinji Tanaka; Mamoru Watanabe; Toshifumi Hibi
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 7.527

Review 2.  Colonoscopic polypectomy: a critical review of recent literature.

Authors:  Peter H Rubin; Jerome D Waye
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2006-10

Review 3.  Risk for colorectal cancer in ulcerative colitis: changes, causes and management strategies.

Authors:  Peter-Laszlo Lakatos; Laszlo Lakatos
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  An updated approach to dysplasia in IBD.

Authors:  David T Rubin
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 5.  Colorectal cancer in inflammatory bowel disease: what is the real magnitude of the risk?

Authors:  Jessica K Dyson; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Current management of inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Mark C Mattar; Denver Lough; Michael J Pishvaian; Aline Charabaty
Journal:  Gastrointest Cancer Res       Date:  2011-03

Review 7.  Cancer risk in IBD: how to diagnose and how to manage DALM and ALM.

Authors:  Helmut Neumann; Michael Vieth; Cord Langner; Markus F Neurath; Jonas Mudter
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  A guide to multimodal endoscopy imaging for gastrointestinal malignancy - an early indicator.

Authors:  Arthur Hoffman; Henrik Manner; Johannes W Rey; Ralf Kiesslich
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 9.  Curriculum review: colorectal cancer surveillance and management of dysplasia in IBD.

Authors:  Hajir Ibraheim; Angad Singh Dhillon; Ioannis Koumoutsos; Shraddha Gulati; Bu'Hussain Hayee
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-02-10

Review 10.  Indications, stains and techniques in chromoendoscopy.

Authors:  P J Trivedi; B Braden
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2012-10-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.