Literature DB >> 16328912

Validation of an extended version of the SEIQoL-DW in a cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma' survivors.

L Wettergren1, M Björkholm, A Langius-Eklöf.   

Abstract

Individual measures of quality of life (QoL) have been initiated to overcome the possible limitations with standardized measures using predefined domains for evaluation. The Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life-Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) uses personal interviews to explore the five most important areas in life, both positive and negative, crucial for QoL. The nominated areas are rated regarding satisfaction and weighted to capture the importance of each selected area. The Swedish version has been extended with a disease-specific module, which evaluates the areas in life influenced by disease. The aim of this study was to validate the disease-specific SEIQoL-DW and furthermore, to evaluate the influence of the importance ratings on the overall index score in a cohort of Hodgkin lymphoma survivors. The results support the construct validity of the disease-specific SEIQoL-DW and indicate that the instrument appears to be a sensitive measure with ability to differentiate between groups with disparate subjective health status. The SEIQoL-DW succeeds to capture both positive and negative areas in life influenced by disease. The present study gave no evidence that the weighting procedure has any impact on the total index. The results support the use of the new extended version including a disease-specific module.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328912     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-8165-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  7 in total

1.  The effect of individually assessed preference weights on the relationship between holistic utilities and nonpreference-based assessment.

Authors:  S J Jansen; A M Stiggelbout; M A Nooij; J Kievit
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Why are we weighting? The role of importance ratings in quality of life measurement.

Authors:  T Trauer; A Mackinnon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity.

Authors:  J Ware; M Kosinski; S D Keller
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Development of a direct weighting procedure for quality of life domains.

Authors:  J P Browne; C A O'Boyle; H M McGee; N J McDonald; C R Joyce
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Determinants of health-related quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma.

Authors:  L Wettergren; M Björkholm; U Axdorph; A Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.147

6.  A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS.

Authors:  A M Hickey; G Bury; C A O'Boyle; F Bradley; F D O'Kelly; W Shannon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-07-06

7.  Individual quality of life in long-term survivors of Hodgkin's lymphoma--a comparative study.

Authors:  L Wettergren; M Björkholm; U Axdorph; A Bowling; A Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 4.147

  7 in total
  8 in total

Review 1.  The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW.

Authors:  L Wettergren; A Kettis-Lindblad; M Sprangers; L Ring
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-06-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  A review of the application, feasibility, and the psychometric properties of the individualized measures in cancer.

Authors:  Ala' S Aburub; Nancy E Mayo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of life and its correlates in octogenarians. Use of the SEIQoL-DW in Wave 5 of the Aberdeen Birth Cohort 1921 Study (ABC1921).

Authors:  David Gwyn Seymour; John M Starr; Helen C Fox; Helen A Lemmon; Ian J Deary; Gordon J Prescott; Lawrence J Whalley
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-12-11       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Evaluation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Positive Psychosocial Constructs in Children and Adolescent/Young Adults with Cancer: A Systematic Review of Measurement Properties.

Authors:  Cole Wayant; Kaylea Bixler; Morgan Garrett; Jennifer W Mack; Drew Wright; Matt Vassar
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2021-05-13       Impact factor: 2.223

Review 5.  Health-related quality of life in Hodgkin lymphoma: a systematic review.

Authors:  Nadine Linendoll; Tully Saunders; Rebecca Burns; Jonathan D Nyce; Kristen B Wendell; Andrew M Evens; Susan K Parsons
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Head and neck cancer patients' perceptions of quality of life and how it is affected by the disease and enteral tube feeding during treatment.

Authors:  Ylva Tiblom Ehrsson; Kay Sundberg; Göran Laurell; Ann Langius-Eklöf
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.384

7.  A Reliability Generalization Meta-Analysis of 17 Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Positive Psychosocial Constructs in Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults with Cancer.

Authors:  Cole Wayant; Morgan Garrett; Kaylea Bixler; Jennifer Mack; Jon Goodell; Matt Vassar
Journal:  J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 1.757

8.  Individual quality of life: adaptive conjoint analysis as an alternative for direct weighting?

Authors:  A M Stiggelbout; E de Vogel-Voogt; E M Noordijk; T P M Vliet Vlieland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.147

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.