Literature DB >> 16328645

Analysis of 30 breast implant rupture cases.

Kwan Chul Tark1, Hii Sun Jeong, Tae Suk Roh, Jong Woo Choi.   

Abstract

Breast implants used for augmentation mammoplasty or breast reconstruction could rupture from various causes such as trauma or spontaneous failure. The objectives of this study were to investigate the relationships between the causes of implant rupture and the degree of capsular contracture, and then to evaluate the relative efficacies of specific signs on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) known to be beneficial for diagnosing the rupture. A retrospective review identified patients with prosthetic implant rupture or impending rupture treated by the senior author. The 30 cases of implant rupture available for review were classified into two groups: intracapsular and extracapsular ruptures. The 30 cases of breast implant ruptures were analyzed with respect to the clinical symptoms and signs, the causes of rupture, the degree of capsular contracture, and therapeutic plans. Among the 30 cases, 14 patients who had undergone MRI during the diagnostic period were analyzed with respect to the relationships between MRI readings and operative findings. Spontaneous rupture of membranes was most common (80%), followed by failure because of trauma (7%) and valve or implant base (4%). The symptoms during implant rupture were contour deformity, palpated mass-like lesions, pain, and focal inflammation. According to the analysis of specific MRI signs, the sensitivity and specificity of the linguine sign were 87% and 100%, respectively, for intracapsular rupture. For extracapsular rupture, the sensitivity and specificity of the linguine sign were, respectively, 67% and 75%. The sensitivity and specificity of the rat-tail sign and tear drop sign were 14% and 50%, respectively. Breast implant rupture was correlated with the degree of capsular contracture in our study. Among the various specific MRI signs used in diagnosing the rupture, the linguine sign was reliable and had a high sensitivity and specificity, especially in cases of intracapsular rupture. On the other hand, the rat-tail and tear drop signs were nonspecific signs for diagnosing the rupture of breast implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328645     DOI: 10.1007/s00266-004-0146-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg        ISSN: 0364-216X            Impact factor:   2.326


  6 in total

1.  Role of US in evaluating breast implant integrity.

Authors:  Michele Telegrafo; Marco Moschetta
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2015-06-23

2.  An adipoinductive role of inflammation in adipose tissue engineering: key factors in the early development of engineered soft tissues.

Authors:  Heidi E Lilja; Wayne A Morrison; Xiao-Lian Han; Jason Palmer; Caroline Taylor; Richard Tee; Andreas Möller; Erik W Thompson; Keren M Abberton
Journal:  Stem Cells Dev       Date:  2013-01-29       Impact factor: 3.272

3.  Unexpected Silicone Breast Implant Rupture After Implantation of Insertable Loop Recorder.

Authors:  Samridhi Syal; Victor Mwansa; Lovely Chhabra
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Apr-Jun

4.  Imaging of breast implants-a pictorial review.

Authors:  Sergi Juanpere; Elsa Perez; Oscar Huc; Naiara Motos; Josep Pont; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2011-08-07

5.  Comparison of the Explantation Rate of Poly Implant Prothèse, Allergan, and Pérouse Silicone Breast Implants within the First Four Years after Reconstructive Surgery before the Poly Implant Prothèse Alert by the French Regulatory Authority.

Authors:  Alexandre Leduey; Chafika Mazouni; Nicolas Leymarie; Heba Alkhashnam; Benjamin Sarfati; Jean-Rémi Garbay; Amélie Gaudin; Frédéric Kolb; Françoise Rimareix
Journal:  Int J Breast Cancer       Date:  2015-10-12

6.  Diagnostic value of a spiral breast computed tomography system equipped with photon counting detector technology in patients with implants: An observational study of our initial experiences.

Authors:  Lisa Ruby; Sojin Shim; Nicole Berger; Magda Marcon; Thomas Frauenfelder; Andreas Boss
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 1.817

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.