Literature DB >> 16328535

Chewing activities and oesophageal motility during feed intake, rumination and eructation in camels.

W von Engelhardt1, P Haarmeyer, M Kaske, M Lechner-Doll.   

Abstract

It was the aim of this study to characterize rumination behaviour, eructation and oesophageal motility in camels to identify similarities and differences between camels and domestic ruminants. Recordings were carried out in five camels fed on a hay-based diet. On an average, the duration of rumination, feeding and resting was 8.3, 5.6 and 10.1 h per 24 h, respectively. Rumination activity peaked in the morning between 9:00 and 11:00 and in the night between 02:00 and 04:00 a.m. During rumination periods, on an average 67 boluses were regurgitated per hour. Each bolus was chewed for an average of 45 s with 68 chews per min. The pause between two rumination cycles lasted on an average 9 s. Hay intake took 61 min/kg dry matter (DM), rumination lasted 71 min/kg DM of hay consumed. The regurgitation of a bolus started with a contraction of cranial compartment 1 (C 1) during a B-sequence, followed by a deep inspiration with closed glottis. Digesta enters the oesophagus, and an antiperistaltic wave transported the bolus orally. Eructation starts with a contraction of the caudal C1 during a B-sequence when the cranial C1 is relaxed. After entering the oesophagus, a rapid antiperistaltic wave transports the gas orally. Results revealed that the parameter values obtained in the camels were remarkably similar to those in domestic ruminants despite profound morphological differences and different patterns of forestomach motility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328535     DOI: 10.1007/s00360-005-0027-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol B        ISSN: 0174-1578            Impact factor:   2.200


  19 in total

1.  Eating and ruminating behavior of steers fed Coastal Bermudagrass hay at four levels.

Authors:  J M Luginbuhl; K R Pond; J C Burns; J C Russ
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Improved infusion system for intraluminal esophageal manometry.

Authors:  R C Arndorfer; J J Stef; W J Dodds; J H Linehan; W J Hogan
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-07       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  The mucigenous glandular mucosa in the comples stomach of two new-world camelids, the llama and guanaco.

Authors:  J F Cummings; J F Munnell; A Vallenas
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 1.804

4.  Proposal to use time spent chewing as an index of the extent to which diets for ruminants possess the physical property of fibrousness characteristic of roughages.

Authors:  C C Balch
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 3.718

Review 5.  Motor functions of the ruminant forestomach.

Authors:  A F Sellers; C E Stevens
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1966-10       Impact factor: 37.312

6.  Influence of forage quality on rumination time in sheep.

Authors:  J G Welch; A M Smith
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 3.159

7.  Effects of monensin on voluntary intake, eating and ruminating behavior and ruminal motility in heifers fed corn silage.

Authors:  A G Deswysen; W C Ellis; K R Pond; W L Jenkins; J Connelly
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of particle size of forage and rumen cannulation upon chewing activity and laterality in dairy cows.

Authors:  R J Grant; V F Colenbrander; J L Albright
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows.

Authors:  R G Dado; M S Allen
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.034

10.  The efficiency of chewing during eating and ruminating in goats and sheep.

Authors:  B M Domingue; D W Dellow; T N Barry
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.718

View more
  4 in total

1.  Digesta retention patterns of solute and different-sized particles in camelids compared with ruminants and other foregut fermenters.

Authors:  Marie T Dittmann; Ullrich Runge; Sylvia Ortmann; Richard A Lang; Dario Moser; Cordula Galeffi; Angela Schwarm; Michael Kreuzer; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  J Comp Physiol B       Date:  2015-04-29       Impact factor: 2.200

2.  Methane emission by camelids.

Authors:  Marie T Dittmann; Ullrich Runge; Richard A Lang; Dario Moser; Cordula Galeffi; Michael Kreuzer; Marcus Clauss
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Daily rhythms of behavioral and hormonal patterns in male dromedary camels housed in boxes.

Authors:  Lydiane Aubè; Meriem Fatnassi; Davide Monaco; Touhami Khorchani; Giovanni Michele Lacalandra; Mohamed Hammadi; Barbara Padalino
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Rumination syndrome: pathophysiology, diagnosis and practical management.

Authors:  Ayodele Sasegbon; Syed Shariq Hasan; Benjamin R Disney; Dipesh Harshvadan Vasant
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-01-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.