Literature DB >> 16328304

Adaptation to unilateral change in lower limb mechanical properties during human walking.

Jeremy W Noble1, Stephen D Prentice.   

Abstract

To produce successful and safe walking movements, the locomotor control system must have a detailed awareness of the mechanical properties of the lower limbs. Flexibility of this control comes from an ability to identify and accommodate any changes in limb mechanics by updating its internal representation of the lower limb. To explore the ability of the locomotor control system to tune its representation of the lower limb, eight participants performed three 5 min trials (PRE, WEIGHT and POST) of treadmill walking. During the middle trial the participants wore a 2 kg mass around the leg segment of the left lower limb. Joint kinematics and kinetics were determined to assess changes in the walking movements. The modification of limb inertia by adding mass to the limbs (WEIGHT) required a substantive period of adaptation, which lasted between 45 and 50 strides, before individuals fully adjusted to their new lower limb mechanics to achieve steady-state joint kinematics. These movements were caused in part from an increase in hip flexor and knee extensor activity in early swing followed by an increase in hip extensors and knee flexor activity in late swing. Following the removal of the mass (POST), ankle, knee and hip flexion all increased above the levels that were observed in the PRE condition and returned the baseline levels within 20, 70 and 70 strides, respectively. The removal of the mass appeared to cause a greater disruption to walking than the addition of mass to the limb despite a quick return of the joint moments to the PRE condition. Both the changes following the addition of the mass and its subsequent removal may embody a recalibration of the internal limb representation. These changes were characterized by an integrated response consisting of primary recalibration to the modified mechanical parameters and secondary actions to main the integrity of locomotor objectives such as propulsion, balance, support and safe foot trajectories. These recalibration responses were similar to those demonstrated in upper limb movements in response to altered force environments. Understanding this recalibration process will have implications for the prevention of trips and falls as individuals encounter different movement environments or changes to mechanical properties of their limbs, especially for individuals with decreased proprioception or other neural challenges.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16328304     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-0162-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  21 in total

1.  Independent learning of internal models for kinematic and dynamic control of reaching.

Authors:  J W Krakauer; M F Ghilardi; C Ghez
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  Motor systems.

Authors:  K Pearson
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 3.  Spinal circuitry of sensorimotor control of locomotion.

Authors:  D A McCrea
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 4.  Symmetry and limb dominance in able-bodied gait: a review.

Authors:  H Sadeghi; P Allard; F Prince; H Labelle
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 2.840

5.  Knowledge Model for Selecting and Producing Reaching Movements.

Authors:  D. A. Rosenbaum; S. E. Engelbrecht; M. M. Bushe; L. D. Loukopoulos
Journal:  J Mot Behav       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.328

6.  Adaptations in arm movements for added mass to wrist or ankle during walking.

Authors:  S F Donker; Th Mulder; B Nienhuis; J Duysens
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 7.  Spinal cord pattern generators for locomotion.

Authors:  V Dietz
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.708

Review 8.  Optimal feedback control and the neural basis of volitional motor control.

Authors:  Stephen H Scott
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 34.870

9.  Proprioceptive control of interjoint coordination.

Authors:  C Ghez; R Sainburg
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.273

10.  Modelling the time-keeping function of the central pattern generator for locomotion using artificial sequential neural network.

Authors:  S D Prentice; A E Patla; D A Stacey
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 2.602

View more
  38 in total

1.  Rapid changes in corticospinal excitability during force field adaptation of human walking.

Authors:  D Barthélemy; S Alain; M J Grey; J B Nielsen; L J Bouyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Strategy adoption and locomotor adjustment in obstacle clearance of newly walking toddlers with Down syndrome after different treadmill interventions.

Authors:  Jianhua Wu; Dale A Ulrich; Julia Looper; Chad W Tiernan; Rosa M Angulo-Barroso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Effects of walking in a force field for varying durations on aftereffects and on next day performance.

Authors:  Karine Fortin; Andreanne Blanchette; Bradford J McFadyen; Laurent J Bouyer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Poststroke hemiparesis impairs the rate but not magnitude of adaptation of spatial and temporal locomotor features.

Authors:  Douglas N Savin; Shih-Chiao Tseng; Jill Whitall; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2012-02-24       Impact factor: 3.919

5.  Perturbation schedule does not alter retention of a locomotor adaptation across days.

Authors:  Sara J Hussain; Susanne M Morton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Influence of ankle loading on the relationship between temporal pressure and motor coordination during a whole-body paired task.

Authors:  Eric Yiou; Tarek Hussein; Jacques LaRue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The role of movement errors in modifying spatiotemporal gait asymmetry post stroke: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Michael D Lewek; Carty H Braun; Clint Wutzke; Carol Giuliani
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 3.477

8.  Generalization of improved step length symmetry from treadmill to overground walking in persons with stroke and hemiparesis.

Authors:  Douglas N Savin; Susanne M Morton; Jill Whitall
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Medial gastrocnemius myoelectric control of a robotic ankle exoskeleton.

Authors:  Catherine R Kinnaird; Daniel P Ferris
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.802

10.  Effects of unilateral robotic limb loading on gait characteristics in subjects with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Ira Khanna; Anindo Roy; Mary M Rodgers; Hermano I Krebs; Richard M Macko; Larry W Forrester
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 4.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.