| Literature DB >> 16328212 |
A Hamza1, H Loertzer, A Wicht, O Rettkowski, E Koch, P Fornara.
Abstract
Due to increasingly better long-term survival rates with dialysis the number of patients with renal failure constantly increases by 4% annually worldwide. Despite great progress in operative and perioperative management as well as improved immunosuppressive drugs, kidney transplantation still faces two major problems. First of all there is a huge deficit of donor organs and secondly the long-term results of the kidney grafts must be improved. One way to relieve this tense situation may be live kidney donation. In many countries not participating in Eurotransplant, especially the United States and Scandinavia, live kidney donation is performed more often than kidney transplantation from deceased donors. Germany implemented a transplantation law in December 1997. This law also regulates living donation, with exclusion of crossover transplantations. Cross-over transplantation is a special variation of live donation for couples who cannot donate/receive in their respective couple constellation. Therefore, the donor of the one couple donates his/her kidney to the recipient of the other couple and vice versa. According to German legislation this is illegal. We performed a study in order to evaluate the opinions of the German kidney transplant centers on crossover kidney transplantations. The majority of the German transplantation centers believe that crossover transplantation is acceptable with regard to ethical and medical concerns. To enable this kind of kidney transplantation the transplantation law would have to be changed. Nevertheless, nationwide polls show that live kidney donation represents only a very small portion of all transplantations taking place. Live kidney donation should be granted higher priority as dialysis triggers psychological and physical damage, especially in children. For many patients live kidney donation is the only chance for early transplantation with an excellent long-lasting kidney graft function.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16328212 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-005-0965-7
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Urologe A ISSN: 0340-2592 Impact factor: 0.639