Literature DB >> 16328198

[An empirical analysis of patients' preference of setting for outpatient arthroscopic surgery].

D L B Schwappach1, T J Strasmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to investigate patient preferences of setting for outpatient surgery--office-based, hospital-based, or inpatient care environment--and the factors relevant to their decision.
METHODS: Preferences were elicited from a sample of the general population (n=1,134) with a discrete choice model, an efficient technique for estimating utility. Participants chose their preferred mode among different outpatient scenarios for hypothetical arthroscopic surgery.
RESULTS: The subjects were open to alternative options of care delivery and based their decisions on particular attributes, "specialization," "staff continuity," and "waiting time" having the largest effect on choices. A slight preference for hospital-based outpatient surgery was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show that patients' choice of providers is open and based on specific attributes of treatment delivery and institution and not the setting per se.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16328198     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-005-1102-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  12 in total

1.  [Health policy guidelines for ambulatory and brief inpatient surgery. Backgrounds, facts and possible future solutions].

Authors:  M Lüngen; K W Lauterbach
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  A comparison of patients' and health care professionals' preferences for symptoms during immediate postoperative recovery and the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Authors:  Anna Lee; Tony Gin; Angel S C Lau; Floria F Ng
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.108

3.  Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.

Authors:  M Ryan; D A Scott; C Reeves; A Bate; E R van Teijlingen; E M Russell; M Napper; C M Robb
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.014

4.  Patients who attend a private practice vs a university outpatient clinic: how do they differ?

Authors:  N Junod Perron; B Favrat; M Vannotti
Journal:  Swiss Med Wkly       Date:  2004-12-18       Impact factor: 2.193

5.  Preferences of patients for emergency services available during usual GP surgery hours: a discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Karen Gerard; Val Lattimer
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2004-11-04       Impact factor: 2.267

6.  Understanding patients' views of a surgical outpatient clinic.

Authors:  A Waghorn; M McKee
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.431

7.  Establishing patient preferences for gastroenterology clinic reorganization using conjoint analysis.

Authors:  Paul Moayyedi; Mark Wardman; Jeremy Toner; Mandy Ryan; Sara Duffett
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.566

8.  [Outpatient operations and inpatient care changes according to section sign 115 b SGB V].

Authors:  N Roeder; H Bunzemeier; B Rochell; P Hensen
Journal:  Z Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.000

9.  Patient preferences for acute pain treatment.

Authors:  T J Gan; D A Lubarsky; E M Flood; T Thanh; J Mauskopf; T Mayne; C Chen
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2004-03-05       Impact factor: 9.166

10.  [Quality assurance in ambulatory surgery].

Authors:  M L Hansis
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 0.955

View more
  1 in total

1.  [Potential of inpatient cases of a university hospital for orthopedics and trauma surgery for outpatient care].

Authors:  Jeanette Henkelmann; Ralf Henkelmann; Nikolaus von Dercks
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie (Heidelb)       Date:  2021-08-31
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.