Literature DB >> 16327544

Allograft and alloplastic bone substitutes: a review of science and technology for the craniomaxillofacial surgeon.

Barry L Eppley1, William S Pietrzak, Matthew W Blanton.   

Abstract

Bone healing is a complex and multifactorial process. As such, there are numerous steps in the process to which intervention can be directed. This has given rise to many bone graft technologies that have been used to regenerate bone, creating, perhaps, a bewildering array of options. The options that surgeons have the most familiarity with are the ones that have been available the longest (i.e., autograft and allograft). Although useful for the widest spectrum of clinical applications, limitations of these grafts has prompted the development of new materials. Demineralized bone matrix formulations and synthetic ceramic materials are now being used with greater frequency. These biomaterials have demonstrated their usefulness in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery with their ability to augment and replace portions of the craniofacial skeleton. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss the allograft and alloplastic bone grafting technologies so that the reader can consider each in the context of the others and gain a better appreciation for how each fits into the universe of existing and emerging treatments for bone regeneration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16327544     DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179662.38172.dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniofac Surg        ISSN: 1049-2275            Impact factor:   1.046


  40 in total

1.  Tailor-made tricalcium phosphate bone implant directly fabricated by a three-dimensional ink-jet printer.

Authors:  Kazuyo Igawa; Manabu Mochizuki; Osamu Sugimori; Koutaro Shimizu; Kenji Yamazawa; Hiroshi Kawaguchi; Kozo Nakamura; Tsuyoshi Takato; Ryouhei Nishimura; Shigeki Suzuki; Masahiro Anzai; Ung-il Chung; Nobuo Sasaki
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  Bioactive factors for tissue regeneration: state of the art.

Authors:  Shinsuke Ohba; Hironori Hojo; Ung-Il Chung
Journal:  Muscles Ligaments Tendons J       Date:  2012-10-16

3.  Maxillofacial reconstruction using custom-made artificial bones fabricated by inkjet printing technology.

Authors:  Hideto Saijo; Kazuyo Igawa; Yuki Kanno; Yoshiyuki Mori; Kayoko Kondo; Koutaro Shimizu; Shigeki Suzuki; Daichi Chikazu; Mitsuki Iino; Masahiro Anzai; Nobuo Sasaki; Ung-il Chung; Tsuyoshi Takato
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2009-09-19       Impact factor: 1.731

Review 4.  [Resorbable bone substitution materials: An overview of commercially available materials and new approaches in the field of composites].

Authors:  S Heinemann; M Gelinsky; H Worch; T Hanke
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Exploring CBCT-based DICOM files. A systematic review on the properties of images used to evaluate maxillofacial bone grafts.

Authors:  Rubens Spin-Neto; Elcio Marcantonio; Erik Gotfredsen; Ann Wenzel
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Conditioned media from mesenchymal stem cells enhanced bone regeneration in rat calvarial bone defects.

Authors:  Masashi Osugi; Wataru Katagiri; Ryoko Yoshimi; Takeharu Inukai; Hideharu Hibi; Minoru Ueda
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 7.  Biomaterial delivery of morphogens to mimic the natural healing cascade in bone.

Authors:  Manav Mehta; Katharina Schmidt-Bleek; Georg N Duda; David J Mooney
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Pilot study on orthodontic space closure after guided bone regeneration.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; Matthias Wenghöfer; Werner Götz; Andreas Jäger
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.938

9.  Advancing biomaterials of human origin for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Fa-Ming Chen; Xiaohua Liu
Journal:  Prog Polym Sci       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 29.190

10.  In vitro proliferation of human osteogenic cells in presence of different commercial bone substitute materials combined with enamel matrix derivatives.

Authors:  Christoph Reichert; Bilal Al-Nawas; Ralf Smeets; Adrian Kasaj; Werner Götz; Marcus O Klein
Journal:  Head Face Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 2.151

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.