PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to present the long-term outcomes of ultra-thin polyethylene implants used for orbital floor reconstruction in facial trauma patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2004, 38 patients underwent orbital floor reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants with a mean follow-up of 4 years. A subciliary incision and preexisting facial wounds or scars were used. The boundaries of the maxillofacial injury and the orbital volumes of both orbits were assessed by computed tomography images obtained pre- and postoperatively. In all patients, ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in various sizes were used to reconstruct the orbital floor defect. RESULTS: None of the patients needed removal of the implants during the follow-up. The volume increase of the traumatized orbits ranged from 0.04 to 6.18 (average 3.12 +/- 1.48) mL compared with the intact orbit (P < 0.01). This difference was not significant postoperatively (P > 0.01). Postoperative ectropion in three cases was corrected under local anesthesia. Persistence of complications were as follows: enophthalmos, 3 in 28; diplopia, 1 in 16; dystopia, 1 in 4; and infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, 3 in 31. One patient underwent late enucleation of the globe because of initial penetrating trauma. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in the reconstruction of the orbital floor defects in facial trauma patients. The implants are durable in the long-term and mimic the anatomy of the thin orbital floor and avoid the morbidity of autogenous bone grafts.
PURPOSE: The objective of this article is to present the long-term outcomes of ultra-thin polyethylene implants used for orbital floor reconstruction in facial traumapatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1998 to 2004, 38 patients underwent orbital floor reconstruction with porous polyethylene implants with a mean follow-up of 4 years. A subciliary incision and preexisting facial wounds or scars were used. The boundaries of the maxillofacial injury and the orbital volumes of both orbits were assessed by computed tomography images obtained pre- and postoperatively. In all patients, ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in various sizes were used to reconstruct the orbital floor defect. RESULTS: None of the patients needed removal of the implants during the follow-up. The volume increase of the traumatized orbits ranged from 0.04 to 6.18 (average 3.12 +/- 1.48) mL compared with the intact orbit (P < 0.01). This difference was not significant postoperatively (P > 0.01). Postoperative ectropion in three cases was corrected under local anesthesia. Persistence of complications were as follows: enophthalmos, 3 in 28; diplopia, 1 in 16; dystopia, 1 in 4; and infraorbital nerve hypoesthesia, 3 in 31. One patient underwent late enucleation of the globe because of initial penetrating trauma. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend the use of ultra-thin porous polyethylene implants in the reconstruction of the orbital floor defects in facial traumapatients. The implants are durable in the long-term and mimic the anatomy of the thin orbital floor and avoid the morbidity of autogenous bone grafts.
Authors: T V Kühnel; E Vairaktaris; K A Schlegel; F W Neukam; B Kühnel; L M Holbach; E Nkenke Journal: Ophthalmologe Date: 2008-06 Impact factor: 1.059
Authors: Martin Gosau; Moritz Schöneich; Florian G Draenert; Tobias Ettl; Oliver Driemel; Torsten E Reichert Journal: Clin Oral Investig Date: 2010-02-18 Impact factor: 3.573