Literature DB >> 16327297

Uterus-sparing vaginal surgery of genitourinary prolapse employing biocompatible material.

Giulio Nicita1, Vincenzo Li Marzi, Maria Teresa Filocamo, Eugenio Dattolo, Michele Marzocco, Maria Cristina Paoletti, Donata Villari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The study presents an original uterus sparing technique for transvaginal repair of total genitourinary prolapse. The technique employs a synthetic mesh of mixed polypropylene and 910 polyglactin fibers.
METHODS: The prosthesis creates a support for the cystocele, the cervix and the enterocele. It has four anchoring sites: two at the rear in the sacrospinous ligaments and two at the front in the arcus tendineous of the levator ani muscle. Between February 2001 and December 2004, 24 patients (mean age 66.9 years), presenting symptoms of uterine prolapse, cystocele and enterocele (POP-Q stage III-IV Aa associated to II-III-IV C), were treated with our procedure. Pre- and postoperative parameters were evaluated statistically.
RESULTS: No patient had any serious complications. The mean follow-up was 31.1 months (range 6-52). 19 patients (79.1%) have shown excellent results and have been completely cured. In 5 other cases (20.8%), the cystocele was completely cured and there was a significant improvement in the hysterocele and the enterocele. One patient required surgical treatment for postoperative stress incontinence. Statistical analysis of data regarding the pre- and postoperative prolapse stage demonstrated a high degree of objective cure rates (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: While hysterectomy remains the habitual treatment for severe uterine prolapse, our technique provides a promising alternative solution. It is also significant that there were no complications of erosion or infection associated with the prosthesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16327297     DOI: 10.1159/000089165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  7 in total

Review 1.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Five-year outcome of uterus sparing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a single-center experience.

Authors:  Elisabetta Costantini; Massimo Lazzeri; Alessandro Zucchi; Vittorio Bini; Luigi Mearini; Massimo Porena
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2010-12-09       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Conservation of the prolapsed uterus is a valid option: medium term results of a prospective comparative study with the posterior intravaginal slingoplasty operation.

Authors:  M Neuman; Y Lavy
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-11-30

Review 4.  Uterus preservation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery.

Authors:  Alessandro Zucchi; Massimo Lazzeri; Massimo Porena; Luigi Mearini; Elisabetta Costantini
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Transverse cystocele repair with uterine preservation using native tissue.

Authors:  R Keith Huffaker; Thomas J Kuehl; Tristi W Muir; Paul M Yandell; Lisa M Pierce; Bobby L Shull
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-05-08

Review 6.  Uterine sparing surgical methods in pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Esra Nur Tola; Evrim Erdemoğlu; Ebru Erdemoğlu
Journal:  Turk J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-09-15

7.  Robot-assisted sacro(hystero)colpopexy with anterior and posterior mesh placement: impact on lower bowel tract function and clinical outcomes at mid-term follow-up.

Authors:  Vincenzo Li Marzi; Simone Morselli; Fabrizio Di Maida; Stefania Musco; Luca Gemma; Francesco Bracco; Riccardo Tellini; Gianni Vittori; Andrea Mari; Riccardo Campi; Marco Carini; Sergio Serni; Andrea Minervini
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-04-21
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.