OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of bleomycin omission from second and third cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy in low-volume stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumor patients who achieve a normal tumor marker level after the first cycle of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 59 nonseminomatous testicular cancer patients with low-volume retroperitoneal disease, serum markers normalized after the first cycle of treatment in 30 cases. 12 patients completed 3BEP (group 1; years 1994-1998) and other 18 patients received etoposide and cisplatin (EP) as second and third cycles of chemotherapy (group 2; years 1998-2004). RESULTS: All patients from each group achieved complete response with chemotherapy alone or by subsequent resection of teratoma or necrosis. There was no relapse with active cancer after the treatment. All patients remained disease-free during the median follow-up period of 97 and 48 months for groups 1 and 2 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One cycle of BEP plus two cycles of EP chemotherapy was as effective as three standard cycles of BEP. The regimen can be suggested as a less toxic therapeutic alternative in these selected patients. More cases, however, in a prospective randomized setting are required to further verify these data.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of bleomycin omission from second and third cycles of bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin (BEP) chemotherapy in low-volume stage II nonseminomatous germ cell tumorpatients who achieve a normal tumor marker level after the first cycle of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Out of 59 nonseminomatous testicular cancerpatients with low-volume retroperitoneal disease, serum markers normalized after the first cycle of treatment in 30 cases. 12 patients completed 3BEP (group 1; years 1994-1998) and other 18 patients received etoposide and cisplatin (EP) as second and third cycles of chemotherapy (group 2; years 1998-2004). RESULTS: All patients from each group achieved complete response with chemotherapy alone or by subsequent resection of teratoma or necrosis. There was no relapse with active cancer after the treatment. All patients remained disease-free during the median follow-up period of 97 and 48 months for groups 1 and 2 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: One cycle of BEP plus two cycles of EP chemotherapy was as effective as three standard cycles of BEP. The regimen can be suggested as a less toxic therapeutic alternative in these selected patients. More cases, however, in a prospective randomized setting are required to further verify these data.