Literature DB >> 1632680

Pancreas transplantation. An initial experience with systemic and portal drainage of pancreatic allografts.

L K Rosenlof1, R C Earnhardt, T L Pruett, W C Stevenson, M T Douglas, G C Cornett, J B Hanks.   

Abstract

Pancreas transplantation has evolved dramatically since its introduction in 1966. As new centers for transplantation have developed, the evaluation of complications associated with pancreas transplantation has led to advances in surgical technique. Furthermore, surgical alterations of the pancreas resulting from transplantation (systemic release of insulin and denervation) are of unproven consequence on glucose metabolism. Since 1988, the authors have performed 21 transplants (16 combined pancreas/kidney, 3 pancreas alone, which includes 1 retransplantation, 1 pancreas after previous kidney transplant, and 1 "cluster") in 20 patients aged 18 to 49 years; mean, 35 +/- 1 years. Overall patient survival is 95%. Three pancreatic grafts failed within the first year because of technical failure; one additional pancreas was lost to an immunologic event on postoperative day 449, for an overall pancreatic graft survival of 81%. No renal grafts were lost. To evaluate causes of graft failure, demographic data were compared, which included age and sex of the donor and the recipient, operative time, intraoperative blood transfusion, and ischemic time of the graft. No statistically significant differences were found between groups except for ischemic time (11.7 +/- 6.4 hours for the technical success group versus 19.8 +/- 3.7 hours for the technical failure group; p less than 0.05 by unpaired Student's t test). Quadruple immunosuppression was used, which included prednisone, cyclosporine, azathioprine, and antilymphoblast globulin. A mean of 1.2 (range, 0 to 3) rejection episodes per patient occurred. Mean hospital stay was 24 +/- 11 days. Surgical and infectious complications were evaluated by comparing the technical success (TS) group (n = 17) with the technical failure (TF) group. Surgical complications in the TS group revealed a mean of 1.3 episodes per patient, whereas the TF group had 3.7 episodes per patient. The TS also had a reduced incidence of infectious complications compared with the TF (1.7 versus 4.3 episodes per patient). Cytomegalovirus was common in both groups, accounting for 11 infectious episodes, and occurred on a mean postoperative day of 38. Mean postoperative HbA1C levels dropped to 5 +/- 1% from 11 +/- 3%. The authors developed a new technique that incorporates portal drainage of the pancreatic venous effluent in three recipients. Preoperative metabolic studies disclosed a mean fasting glucose of 211 +/- 27 mg/dL and a mean stimulated glucose value of 434 +/- 41 mg/dL for all patients; the mean fasting insulin was 23 +/- 4 microU/mL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1632680      PMCID: PMC1242509          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199206000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  28 in total

1.  Use of recipient mesenteric vessels for revascularization of segmental pancreas grafts: technical and metabolic considerations.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; F C Goetz; K C Moudry; G M Abouna; J S Najarian
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 1.066

2.  Cyclosporine A interferes with postoperative blood glucose control after clinical pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  D Baumgartner; R Schlumpf; F Largiadèr
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.066

3.  Advantages and disadvantages of urinary tract diversion in clinical pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  L Fernández-Cruz; E Esmatges; J Andreu; E M Targarona; M Prieto; J M Gil-Vernet
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 1.066

4.  Pancreatic transplantation with enteric exocrine diversion--the Stockholm experience.

Authors:  G Tydén; C Brattstrom; G Lundgren; H Wilczek; J Bolinder; R Gunnarsson; J Ostman; C G Groth
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Pancreas transplant results according to the technique of duct management: bladder versus enteric drainage.

Authors:  M Prieto; D E Sutherland; F C Goetz; M E Rosenberg; J S Najarian
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Evaluation of insulin secretion after pancreas autotransplantation by oral or intravenous glucose challenge.

Authors:  P Calhoun; K S Brown; D A Krusch; E Barido; A H Farris; W G Schenk; L E Rudolf; D K Andersen; J B Hanks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Surgical treatment of diabetic nephropathy with simultaneous pancreatic duodenal and renal transplantation.

Authors:  R J Corry; D D Nghiem; J A Schulak; W D Beutel; T A Gonwa
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1986-06

8.  Technique of simultaneous renal pancreatoduodenal transplantation with urinary drainage of pancreatic secretion.

Authors:  D D Nghiem; R J Corry
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 9.  Overview of the association between insulin and atherosclerosis.

Authors:  R W Stout
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 8.694

10.  Hyperinsulinemia. A link between hypertension obesity and glucose intolerance.

Authors:  M Modan; H Halkin; S Almog; A Lusky; A Eshkol; M Shefi; A Shitrit; Z Fuchs
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 14.808

View more
  11 in total

1.  Superiority of portal venous drainage over systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation: a retrospective study.

Authors:  B Philosophe; A C Farney; E J Schweitzer; J O Colonna; B E Jarrell; V Krishnamurthi; A M Wiland; S T Bartlett
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Lessons learned from more than 1,000 pancreas transplants at a single institution.

Authors:  D E Sutherland; R W Gruessner; D L Dunn; A J Matas; A Humar; R Kandaswamy; S M Mauer; W R Kennedy; F C Goetz; R P Robertson; A C Gruessner; J S Najarian
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  Exocrine drainage in vascularized pancreas transplantation in the new millennium.

Authors:  Hany El-Hennawy; Robert J Stratta; Fowler Smith
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

4.  A prospective comparison of simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation with systemic-enteric versus portal-enteric drainage.

Authors:  R J Stratta; M H Shokouh-Amiri; M F Egidi; H P Grewal; A T Kizilisik; N Nezakatgoo; L W Gaber; A O Gaber
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Evolution in pancreas transplantation techniques: simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation using portal-enteric drainage without antilymphocyte induction.

Authors:  R J Stratta; A O Gaber; M H Shokouh-Amiri; K S Reddy; R R Alloway; M F Egidi; H P Grewal; L W Gaber; D Hathaway
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

6.  Pancreas transplantation.

Authors:  Duck Jong Han; David Er Sutherland
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 4.519

7.  Portal venous and enteric exocrine drainage versus systemic venous and bladder exocrine drainage of pancreas grafts: clinical outcome of 40 consecutive transplant recipients.

Authors:  M S Cattral; D L Bigam; A W Hemming; A Carpentier; P D Greig; E Wright; E Cole; D Donat; G F Lewis
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  The effect of systemic venous drainage of the pancreas on insulin sensitivity in dogs.

Authors:  J Radziuk; P Barron; H Najm; J Davies
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 14.808

9.  Hyperinsulinemia after pancreatic transplantation. Prediction by a novel computer model and in vivo verification.

Authors:  R C Earnhardt; D D Kindler; A M Weaver; G Cornett; D Elahi; J D Veldhuis; J B Hanks
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Results of pancreas transplantation with portal venous and enteric drainage.

Authors:  A O Gaber; M H Shokouh-Amiri; D K Hathaway; L Hammontree; A E Kitabchi; L W Gaber; M F Saad; L G Britt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.