T S Richmond1, R Cheney, C W Schwab. 1. School of Nursing, Firearm and Injury Center at Penn, Senior Fellow, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, PA 19104, USA. terryr@nursing.upenn.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Understanding global firearm mortality is hindered by data availability, quality, and comparability. This study assesses the adequacy of publicly available data, examines populations for whom firearm mortality data are not publicly available, and estimates the global burden of non-conflict related firearm mortality. DESIGN: The design is a secondary analysis of existing data. A dataset of countries, populations, economic development, and geographic regions was created, using United Nations 2000 world population data and World Bank classifications of economic development and global regions. Firearm mortality data were obtained from governmental vital statistics reported by the World Health Organization and published survey data. A qualitative review of literature informed estimates for the 15 most populous countries without firearm death data. For countries without data, estimates of firearm deaths were made using quartiles of observed rates and peer reviewed literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Non-conflict related firearm deaths. RESULTS: Global non-conflict related firearm deaths were estimated to fall between 196,000 and 229,000, adjusted to the year 2000. 162,800 firearm deaths adjusted for the year 2000 came from countries reporting data and represent 35% of the world's 186 countries. Public data are not available for 122 of these 186 countries, representing more than three billion (54%) of the world's population, predominately in lower and lower middle income countries. Estimates of firearm death for those countries without data range from 33,200 to 66,200. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the burden of firearm related mortality poses a substantial threat to local and global health.
OBJECTIVE: Understanding global firearm mortality is hindered by data availability, quality, and comparability. This study assesses the adequacy of publicly available data, examines populations for whom firearm mortality data are not publicly available, and estimates the global burden of non-conflict related firearm mortality. DESIGN: The design is a secondary analysis of existing data. A dataset of countries, populations, economic development, and geographic regions was created, using United Nations 2000 world population data and World Bank classifications of economic development and global regions. Firearm mortality data were obtained from governmental vital statistics reported by the World Health Organization and published survey data. A qualitative review of literature informed estimates for the 15 most populous countries without firearm death data. For countries without data, estimates of firearm deaths were made using quartiles of observed rates and peer reviewed literature. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Non-conflict related firearm deaths. RESULTS: Global non-conflict related firearm deaths were estimated to fall between 196,000 and 229,000, adjusted to the year 2000. 162,800 firearm deaths adjusted for the year 2000 came from countries reporting data and represent 35% of the world's 186 countries. Public data are not available for 122 of these 186 countries, representing more than three billion (54%) of the world's population, predominately in lower and lower middle income countries. Estimates of firearm death for those countries without data range from 33,200 to 66,200. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides evidence that the burden of firearm related mortality poses a substantial threat to local and global health.
Authors: Evelyn Depoortere; Francesco Checchi; France Broillet; Sibylle Gerstl; Andrea Minetti; Olivia Gayraud; Virginie Briet; Jennifer Pahl; Isabelle Defourny; Mercedes Tatay; Vincent Brown Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Oct 9-15 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Janet Weiner; Douglas J Wiebe; Therese S Richmond; Kristen Beam; Alan L Berman; Charles C Branas; Rose A Cheney; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; John Firman; Martin Fishbein; Stephen Hargarten; David Hemenway; Robert Jeffcoat; David Kennedy; Christopher S Koper; Jean Lemaire; Matthew Miller; Jeffrey A Roth; C William Schwab; Robert Spitzer; Stephen Teret; Jon Vernick; Daniel Webster Journal: Inj Prev Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 2.399
Authors: Charles C Branas; Michelle C Kondo; Sean M Murphy; Eugenia C South; Daniel Polsky; John M MacDonald Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-10-13 Impact factor: 9.308