Literature DB >> 16326690

Prophylactic fluconazole is effective in preventing fungal colonization and fungal systemic infections in preterm neonates: a single-center, 6-year, retrospective cohort study.

Paolo Manzoni1, Riccardo Arisio, Michael Mostert, MariaLisa Leonessa, Daniele Farina, Maria Agnese Latino, Giovanna Gomirato.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Despite the promising preliminary results observed in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) populations, the use of fluconazole to prevent fungal colonization and infection in preterm neonates in the NICU is still an open question and not yet recommended as a standard of care. We have reviewed our 6-year series to assess the effectiveness and safety of this form of prophylaxis.
METHODS: This retrospective study consisted of 465 neonates who weighed < 1500 g at birth and were admitted to our NICU in the period 1998-2003. Those who were born between 1998 and 2000 and did not receive fluconazole prophylaxis (group A, n = 240) were compared with those who were born between 2001 and 2003 and treated with fluconazole until the 30th day of life (45th for neonates < 1000 g at birth; group B, n = 225). Weekly surveillance cultures were obtained from all patients. Incidence of fungal colonization, incidence of systemic fungal infection (SFI), rate of progression from colonization to infection, and mortality rates attributable to fungi were calculated for both groups and separately for neonates who were < 1000 g (ELBW) and were 1001 to 1500 g (NE-VLBW) at birth.
RESULTS: Overall fungal colonization was significantly lower in group B (24.0%) than in group A (43.8%; relative risk [RR]: 0.406; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.273-0.605). The same was true of neonates with colonization in multiple sites (2.6% vs 5.8%) and of those with colonization from high-risk sites (5.8% vs 19.2%). SFI incidence was significantly lower in group B (10 of 225 cases; 4.4%) than in group A (40 of 240 cases; 16.7%; RR: 0.233; 95% CI: 0.113-0.447). Reduction of both colonization and SFI in group B was greater in the ELBW neonates and also significant in the NE-VLBW neonates. Rate of progression from colonization to infection was significantly lower in group B (0.17 vs 0.38; RR: 0.369; 95% CI: 0.159-0.815). Crude mortality rate attributable to Candida species was 1.7% (4 of 240) in group A vs 0% (0 of 225) in group B. Overall mortality rate (any cause before hospital discharge) was similar in the two groups (11.2% vs 10.6%), but in colonized infants (n = 159), it was significantly lower in group B (3.7% vs 18.1%; RR: 0.174; 95% CI: 0.039-0.778). The incidence of natively fluconazole-resistant fungal species did not increase over the years, and patterns of sensitivity to fluconazole remained the same. No adverse reaction related to fluconazole occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic fluconazole significantly reduces the incidence of colonization and systemic infection by Candida species in both ELBW and NE-VLBW neonates and decreases the rates of progression from initial colonization to massive colonization and to systemic infection. All VLBW neonates may benefit from fluconazole prophylaxis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16326690     DOI: 10.1542/peds.2004-2227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  26 in total

Review 1.  Prophylactic systemic antifungal agents to prevent mortality and morbidity in very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Jemma Cleminson; Nicola Austin; William McGuire
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-10-24

2.  Use of antifungal agents in pediatric and adult high-risk areas.

Authors:  E Ramírez; J García-Rodríguez; A M Borobia; J M Ortega; S Lei; A Barrios-Fernández; M Sánchez; A J Carcas; A Herrero; J M de la Puente; J Frías
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Targeted fluconazole prophylaxis for high-risk very low birth weight infants.

Authors:  Asaph Rolnitsky; Itzhak Levy; Lea Sirota; Itamar Shalit; Gil Klinger
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 4.  Multi-modal approach to prophylaxis of necrotizing enterocolitis: clinical report and review of literature.

Authors:  G Schmolzer; B Urlesberger; Michaela Haim; J Kutschera; G Pichler; E Ritschl; B Resch; F Reiterer; W Müller
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  The diagnostic performance of the beta-glucan assay in the detection of intra-amniotic infection with Candida species.

Authors:  Percy Pacora; Roberto Romero; Offer Erez; Eli Maymon; Bogdan Panaitescu; Juan Pedro Kusanovic; Adi L Tarca; Chaur-Dong Hsu; Sonia S Hassan
Journal:  J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2017-12-27

Review 6.  Triazole use in the nursery: fluconazole, voriconazole, posaconazole, and ravuconazole.

Authors:  Kevin Watt; Paolo Manzoni; Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez; Stefano Rizzollo; Elena Boano; Evelyne Jacqz-Aigrain; Daniel K Benjamin
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 3.731

7.  A review of Candida prophylaxis in the neonatal intensive care population.

Authors:  Michael F Chicella; Eloise D Woodruff; Mital M Desai
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-10

8.  Selective fluconazole prophylaxis in high-risk babies to reduce invasive fungal infection.

Authors:  Brian A McCrossan; Elaine McHenry; Fiona O'Neill; Grace Ong; David G Sweet
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-04-25       Impact factor: 5.747

Review 9.  Treatment and prophylaxis of invasive candidiasis.

Authors:  Nidhi Tripathi; Kevin Watt; Daniel K Benjamin
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.300

10.  Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

Authors:  Peter G Pappas; Carol A Kauffman; David R Andes; Cornelius J Clancy; Kieren A Marr; Luis Ostrosky-Zeichner; Annette C Reboli; Mindy G Schuster; Jose A Vazquez; Thomas J Walsh; Theoklis E Zaoutis; Jack D Sobel
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 9.079

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.