Literature DB >> 16326281

Cervical spine arthroplasty biomechanics.

Christian M Puttlitz1, Denis J DiAngelo.   

Abstract

The advent of cervical intervertebral disc replacement represents an exciting and new frontier in the treatment of myelopathy and discogenic pain. The goal of most disc arthroplasty designs is to attempt to approximate the normal spinal motion as much as possible. This survey article provides a general overview as to the goals of cervical disc replacement, the current state of knowledge concerning how these devices have been evaluated, and a commentary on future work that should be performed to characterize these devices fully.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16326281     DOI: 10.1016/j.nec.2005.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Clin N Am        ISSN: 1042-3680            Impact factor:   2.509


  9 in total

1.  The Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT): 2-year clinical outcome after single-level cervical arthroplasty versus fusion-a prospective, single-blinded, randomized, controlled multicenter study.

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Frode Kolstad; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Are Hugo Pripp; Hege Andresen; Erling Myrseth; Kay Müller; Øystein P Nygaard; John-Anker Zwart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Primary and coupled motions after cervical total disc replacement using a compressible six-degree-of-freedom prosthesis.

Authors:  A G Patwardhan; M N Tzermiadianos; P P Tsitsopoulos; L I Voronov; S M Renner; M L Reo; G Carandang; K Ritter-Lang; R M Havey
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  [Cervical arthroplasty using the Bryan Cervical Disc System].

Authors:  Friedrich Weber; Michael Detzner
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Heterotopic ossification and clinical outcome in nonconstrained cervical arthroplasty 2 years after surgery: the Norwegian Cervical Arthroplasty Trial (NORCAT).

Authors:  Jarle Sundseth; Eva Astrid Jacobsen; Frode Kolstad; Ruth O Sletteberg; Oystein P Nygaard; Lars Gunnar Johnsen; Are Hugo Pripp; Hege Andresen; Oddrun Anita Fredriksli; Erling Myrseth; John A Zwart
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-04-09       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Does Resection of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Affect the Stability of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty?

Authors:  Leonard I Voronov; Robert M Havey; Parmenion P Tsitsopoulos; Saeed Khayatzadeh; Jeremy Goodsitt; Gerard Carandang; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2018-08-03

6.  Do design variations in the artificial disc influence cervical spine biomechanics? A finite element investigation.

Authors:  Ahmad Faizan; Vijay K Goel; Steven R Garfin; Christopher M Bono; Hassan Serhan; Ashok Biyani; Hossein Elgafy; Manoj Krishna; Tai Friesem
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-11-21       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Cervical arthroplasty using ProDisc-C case report.

Authors:  D A Nica; R Copaciu
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2013-03-25

8.  Update on cervical disc arthroplasty: where are we and where are we going?

Authors:  Jorge J Jaramillo-de la Torre; Jonathan N Grauer; James J Yue
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-06

9.  Investigation into Cervical Spine Biomechanics Following Single, Multilevel and Hybrid Disc Replacement Surgery with Dynamic Cervical Implant and Fusion: A Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Muzammil Mumtaz; Iman Zafarparandeh; Deniz Ufuk Erbulut
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.