Literature DB >> 16325482

Suppression of genomic instability by SLX5 and SLX8 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Chaoying Zhang1, Tania M Roberts, Jay Yang, Ridhdhi Desai, Grant W Brown.   

Abstract

Replication forks can stall spontaneously at specific sites in the genome, and upon encountering DNA lesions resulting from chemical or radiation damage. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteins implicated in processing of stalled replication forks include those encoded by the SGS1, TOP3, MUS81, MMS4, SLX1, SLX4, SLX5/HEX3, and SLX8 genes. We tested the roles of these genes in suppressing gross chromosomal rearrangements (GCRs), which include translocations, large interstitial deletions, and loss of a chromosome arm with de novo telomere addition. We found that mus81, mms4, slx1, slx4, slx5, and slx8 mutants all have elevated levels of spontaneous GCRs, and that SLX5 and SLX8 are particularly critical suppressors of GCRs during normal cell cycle progression. In addition to increased GCRs, deletion of SLX5 or SLX8 resulted in increased relocalization of the DNA damage checkpoint protein Ddc2 and activation of the checkpoint kinase Rad53, indicating the accumulation of spontaneous DNA damage. Surprisingly, mutants in slx5 or slx8 were not sensitive to transient replication fork stalling induced by hydroxyurea, nor were they sensitive to replication dependent double-strand breaks induced by camptothecin. This suggested that Slx8 and Slx8 played limited roles in stabilizing, restarting, or resolving transiently stalled replication forks, but were critical for preventing the accumulation of DNA damage during normal cell cycle progression.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16325482     DOI: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2005.10.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)        ISSN: 1568-7856


  55 in total

1.  Sumoylation of MDC1 is important for proper DNA damage response.

Authors:  Kuntian Luo; Haoxing Zhang; Liewei Wang; Jian Yuan; Zhenkun Lou
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2012-05-25       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  SUMO-independent in vivo activity of a SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligase toward a short-lived transcription factor.

Authors:  Yang Xie; Eric M Rubenstein; Tanja Matt; Mark Hochstrasser
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The F-box protein Dia2 overcomes replication impedance to promote genome stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Deborah Blake; Brian Luke; Pamela Kanellis; Paul Jorgensen; Theo Goh; Sonya Penfold; Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz; Daniel Durocher; Matthias Peter; Mike Tyers
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-06-04       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Genetic analysis implicates the Set3/Hos2 histone deacetylase in the deposition and remodeling of nucleosomes containing H2A.Z.

Authors:  Mingda Hang; M Mitchell Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  The Slx5-Slx8 complex affects sumoylation of DNA repair proteins and negatively regulates recombination.

Authors:  Rebecca C Burgess; Sadia Rahman; Michael Lisby; Rodney Rothstein; Xiaolan Zhao
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-06-25       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Conserved function of RNF4 family proteins in eukaryotes: targeting a ubiquitin ligase to SUMOylated proteins.

Authors:  Huaiyu Sun; Joel D Leverson; Tony Hunter
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases in genome stability.

Authors:  John Prudden; Stephanie Pebernard; Grazia Raffa; Daniela A Slavin; J Jefferson P Perry; John A Tainer; Clare H McGowan; Michael N Boddy
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 8.  Genome stability roles of SUMO-targeted ubiquitin ligases.

Authors:  J Heideker; J J P Perry; M N Boddy
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2009-02-23

9.  A genetic screen for increased loss of heterozygosity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Marguerite P Andersen; Zara W Nelson; Elizabeth D Hetrick; Daniel E Gottschling
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Reduced kinase activity of polo kinase Cdc5 affects chromosome stability and DNA damage response in S. cerevisiae.

Authors:  Chetan C Rawal; Sara Riccardo; Chiara Pesenti; Matteo Ferrari; Federica Marini; Achille Pellicioli
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016-08-26       Impact factor: 4.534

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.