Detection of initial caries lesions on smooth surfaces by quantitative light-induced fluorescence and visual examination: an in vivo comparison.

The aim of this clinical study was to compare the outcome of quantitative laser/light-induced fluorescence (QLF) and visual inspection (VI) for the detection of initial caries lesions on all maxillary and mandibular smooth surfaces in caries-risk adolescents. The subjects were 34 students, mean age 15 yr. A total of 879 buccal and 882 lingual surfaces were air-dried and visually examined at a magnification of x3.5. Fluorescence images of each smooth surface were captured with QLF\clin equipment, and QLF software 2.00 was used to display, store, and analyse the images. Fluorescence loss (deltaF; %) and area of the lesion (A; mm2), and fluorescence loss integrated over the lesion area (deltaQ; deltaF x A; % x mm2), were determined. The presence or absence of initial caries lesions was scored using both VI and QLF. A total of 87.2% of all smooth surfaces were scored as sound or initially carious when assessed by VI + QLF in combination: 4.9% were detected by VI alone and 7.9% by QLF alone. The parameters DeltaF, A, and DeltaQ differed significantly between lesions registered with VI + QLF and QLF alone. It was concluded that (i) QLF seems to be a sensitive method that is suitable for the detection of visually undetected initial caries lesions; and (ii) that the clinical use of QLF is limited by several confounding factors in caries-risk adolescents.