Literature DB >> 16324070

Accuracy and concordance of nurses in emergency department triage.

Katarina Göransson1, Anna Ehrenberg, Bertil Marklund, Margareta Ehnfors.   

Abstract

In the emergency department (ED) Registered Nurses (RNs) often perform triage, i.e. the sorting and prioritizing of patients. The allocation of acuity ratings is commonly based on a triage scale. To date, three reliable 5-level triage scales exist, of which the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) is one. In Sweden, few studies on ED triage have been conducted and the organization of triage has been found to vary considerably with no common triage scale. The aim of this study was to investigate the accuracy and concordance of emergency nurses acuity ratings of patient scenarios in the ED setting. Totally, 423 RNs from 48 (62%) Swedish EDs each triaged 18 patient scenarios using the CTAS. Of the 7,550 triage ratings, 57.6% were triaged in concordance with the expected outcome and no scenario was triaged into the same triage level by all RNs. Inter-rater agreement for all RNs was kappa = 0.46 (unweighted) and kappa = 0.71 (weighted). The fact that the kappa-values are only moderate to good and the low concordance between the RNs call for further studies, especially from a patient safety perspective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16324070     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-6712.2005.00372.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Caring Sci        ISSN: 0283-9318


  20 in total

1.  Effects of Interruptions on Triage Process in Emergency Department: A Prospective, Observational Study.

Authors:  Kimberly D Johnson; Gordon L Gillespie; Kimberly Vance
Journal:  J Nurs Care Qual       Date:  2018 Oct/Dec       Impact factor: 1.597

2.  Reliability of the Emergency Severity Index: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amir Mirhaghi; Abbas Heydari; Reza Mazlom; Farzaneh Hasanzadeh
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2015-01-21

Review 3.  The reliability of the Australasian Triage Scale: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohsen Ebrahimi; Abbas Heydari; Reza Mazlom; Amir Mirhaghi
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

4.  Outcomes for emergency severity index triage implementation in the emergency department.

Authors:  Amir Mirhaghi; Hadi Kooshiar; Habibollah Esmaeili; Mohsen Ebrahimi
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2015-04-01

Review 5.  Modern triage in the emergency department.

Authors:  Michael Christ; Florian Grossmann; Daniela Winter; Roland Bingisser; Elke Platz
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  Telephone triage by nurses in primary care out-of-hours services in Norway: an evaluation study based on written case scenarios.

Authors:  Elisabeth Holm Hansen; Steinar Hunskaar
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 7.035

Review 7.  Emergency department triage scales and their components: a systematic review of the scientific evidence.

Authors:  Nasim Farrohknia; Maaret Castrén; Anna Ehrenberg; Lars Lind; Sven Oredsson; Håkan Jonsson; Kjell Asplund; Katarina E Göransson
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.953

8.  A method for reviewing the accuracy and reliability of a five-level triage process (canadian triage and acuity scale) in a community emergency department setting: building the crowding measurement infrastructure.

Authors:  Michael K Howlett; Paul R T Atkinson
Journal:  Emerg Med Int       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 1.112

9.  Barriers to nursing care in emergency wards.

Authors:  Hosein Mahmoudi; Eesa Mohmmadi; Abbas Ebadi
Journal:  Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res       Date:  2013-03

10.  The Reliability of the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale: Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Amir Mirhaghi; Abbas Heydari; Reza Mazlom; Mohsen Ebrahimi
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2015-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.