BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated from urine samples obtained from long-term care patients. The significance of staphylococcal bacteriuria is uncertain. We hypothesized that S. aureus is a urinary pathogen and that colonized urine could be a source of future staphylococcal infection. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 102 patients at a long-term care Veterans Affairs facility for whom S. aureus had been isolated from clinical urine culture. Patients were observed via urine and nasal cultures that were performed every 2 months. We determined the occurrence of (1) symptomatic urinary tract infection concurrent with isolation of S. aureus (by predetermined criteria), (2) staphylococcal bacteremia concomitant with isolation of S. aureus from urine, and (3) subsequent episodes of staphylococcal infection. RESULTS: Of 102 patients, 82% had undergone recent urinary catheterization. Thirty-three percent of patients had symptomatic urinary tract infection at the time of initial isolation of S. aureus, and 13% were bacteremic. Eight-six percent of the initial urine isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Seventy-one patients had follow-up culture data; 58% of cultures were positive for S. aureus at > or =2 months (median duration of staphylococcal bacteriuria, 4.3 months). Sixteen patients had subsequent staphylococcal infections, occurring up to 12 months after initial isolation of S. aureus; 8 late-onset infections were bacteremic. In 5 of 8 patients, the late blood isolate was found to have matched the initial urine isolate by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. CONCLUSIONS: S. aureus is a cause of urinary tract infection among patients with urinary tract catheterization. The majority of isolates are methicillin-resistant S. aureus. S. aureus bacteriuria can lead to subsequent invasive infection. The efficacy of antistaphylococcal therapy in preventing late-onset staphylococcal infection in patients with persistent staphylococcal bacteriuria should be tested in controlled trials.
BACKGROUND:Staphylococcus aureus is frequently isolated from urine samples obtained from long-term care patients. The significance of staphylococcal bacteriuria is uncertain. We hypothesized that S. aureus is a urinary pathogen and that colonized urine could be a source of future staphylococcal infection. METHODS: We performed a cohort study of 102 patients at a long-term care Veterans Affairs facility for whom S. aureus had been isolated from clinical urine culture. Patients were observed via urine and nasal cultures that were performed every 2 months. We determined the occurrence of (1) symptomatic urinary tract infection concurrent with isolation of S. aureus (by predetermined criteria), (2) staphylococcal bacteremia concomitant with isolation of S. aureus from urine, and (3) subsequent episodes of staphylococcal infection. RESULTS: Of 102 patients, 82% had undergone recent urinary catheterization. Thirty-three percent of patients had symptomatic urinary tract infection at the time of initial isolation of S. aureus, and 13% were bacteremic. Eight-six percent of the initial urine isolates were methicillin-resistant S. aureus. Seventy-one patients had follow-up culture data; 58% of cultures were positive for S. aureus at > or =2 months (median duration of staphylococcal bacteriuria, 4.3 months). Sixteen patients had subsequent staphylococcal infections, occurring up to 12 months after initial isolation of S. aureus; 8 late-onset infections were bacteremic. In 5 of 8 patients, the late blood isolate was found to have matched the initial urine isolate by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing. CONCLUSIONS:S. aureus is a cause of urinary tract infection among patients with urinary tract catheterization. The majority of isolates are methicillin-resistant S. aureus. S. aureus bacteriuria can lead to subsequent invasive infection. The efficacy of antistaphylococcal therapy in preventing late-onset staphylococcal infection in patients with persistent staphylococcal bacteriuria should be tested in controlled trials.
Authors: Susana Campuzano; Jahir Orozco; Daniel Kagan; Maria Guix; Wei Gao; Sirilak Sattayasamitsathit; Jonathan C Claussen; Arben Merkoçi; Joseph Wang Journal: Nano Lett Date: 2011-12-07 Impact factor: 11.189
Authors: M Todd Greene; Sanjay Saint; David Ratz; Latoya Kuhn; Jennifer Davis; Payal K Patel; Mary A M Rogers Journal: Am J Infect Control Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 2.918
Authors: Rupak Datta; Atia Shah; Susan S Huang; Eric Cui; Vinh Nguyen; Susan J Welbourne; Kathleen A Quan; Lauri Thrupp Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2013-10-23 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: I G Baraboutis; E P Tsagalou; J L Lepinski; I Papakonstantinou; V Papastamopoulos; A T Skoutelis; S Johnson Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2010-05-30 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: Jennifer N Walker; Ana L Flores-Mireles; Chloe L Pinkner; Henry L Schreiber; Matthew S Joens; Alyssa M Park; Aaron M Potretzke; Tyler M Bauman; Jerome S Pinkner; James A J Fitzpatrick; Alana Desai; Michael G Caparon; Scott J Hultgren Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2017-09-25 Impact factor: 11.205