Literature DB >> 16322991

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of ten phase II clinical trials of pemetrexed in cancer patients.

Jane E Latz1, Ajai Chaudhary, Atalanta Ghosh, Robert D Johnson.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The objectives of these population pharmacokinetic analyses were to (1) assess the overall disposition of pemetrexed, (2) characterize between-patient and within-patient variability and identify influential covariates with respect to pemetrexed pharmacokinetics; and, (3) provide individual empirical Bayesian estimates of pharmacokinetic parameters for use in a subsequent pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic evaluation of neutropenia following pemetrexed administration. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 287 patients who received 441 cycles without folic acid or vitamin B12 supplementation during participation in one of ten phase II cancer trials were evaluated by population pharmacokinetic analysis using NONMEM. Starting doses were 500 or 600 mg pemetrexed per m2 body surface area, administered as 10-min intravenous infusions every 21 days (1 cycle). The model was developed using data from eight of the ten studies. Predictive performance was evaluated using data from the other two studies.
RESULTS: The population pharmacokinetics of pemetrexed administered as a 10-min intravenous infusion are well characterized by a two-compartment model. Typical values of total systemic clearance, central volume of distribution, distributional clearance, and peripheral volume of distribution were 91.6 ml/min, 12.9 l, 14.4 ml/min, and 3.38 l, respectively. Based on these parameter estimates, the terminal elimination half-life of pemetrexed was approximately 3.5 h. Renal function was identified as a covariate with respect to total systemic clearance, and body surface area as a covariate with respect to the central volume of distribution.
CONCLUSION: Total systemic exposure (AUC) for a given dose of pemetrexed increases as renal function decreases. Since pharmacodynamic analyses have shown that AUC and not C (max) is the primary determinant of neutropenic response to pemetrexed, this suggests that dose adjustments based on renal function, rather than body surface area, might be considered for pemetrexed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322991     DOI: 10.1007/s00280-005-0036-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol        ISSN: 0344-5704            Impact factor:   3.333


  22 in total

Review 1.  Covariate pharmacokinetic model building in oncology and its potential clinical relevance.

Authors:  Markus Joerger
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics for treatment optimization in clinical oncology.

Authors:  Anthe S Zandvliet; Jan H M Schellens; Jos H Beijnen; Alwin D R Huitema
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Pemetrexed: a review of its use in the management of advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Claudine M Baldwin; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Concentrative Transport of Antifolates Mediated by the Proton-Coupled Folate Transporter (SLC46A1); Augmentation by a HEPES Buffer.

Authors:  Rongbao Zhao; Mitra Najmi; Srinivas Aluri; David C Spray; I David Goldman
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 4.436

Review 5.  Gender aspects of treatment and drug related toxicity in medical oncology.

Authors:  Christine Marosi
Journal:  Wien Med Wochenschr       Date:  2006-10

6.  Pemetrexed combined with paclitaxel: a dose-finding study evaluating three schedules in solid tumors.

Authors:  Axel-R Hanauske; Herlinde Dumez; Martine Piccart; Emine Yilmaz; Tobias Graefe; Thierry Gil; Lorinda Simms; Luna Musib; Ahmad Awada
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Pharmacokinetics and efficacy of pemetrexed in patients with brain or leptomeningeal metastases.

Authors:  Priya Kumthekar; Sean A Grimm; Michael J Avram; Virginia Kaklamani; Irene Helenowski; Alfred Rademaker; Mary Cianfrocca; William Gradishar; Jyoti Patel; Mary Mulcahy; Katie McCarthy; Jeffrey J Raizer
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 4.130

8.  A phase I study of pemetrexed in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia.

Authors:  Isam Abdel-Karim; William K Plunkett; Susan O'Brien; Francis Giles; Deborah Thomas; Stefan Faderl; Farhad Ravandi; Mary Beth Rios; Min Du; Karen B Schneck; Victor J Chen; Boris K Lin; Steven J Nicol; Hagop M Kantarjian
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 3.850

9.  Caffeine markedly sensitizes human mesothelioma cell lines to pemetrexed.

Authors:  Sang Hee Min; I David Goldman; Rongbao Zhao
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Acute Tubular Necrosis and Interstitial Nephritis during Pemetrexed Therapy.

Authors:  Judith Michels; Jean Philippe Spano; Isabelle Brocheriou; Gilbert Deray; David Khayat; Hassane Izzedine
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2009-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.