Literature DB >> 16322977

The clinical chemistry laboratory: current status, problems and diagnostic prospects.

Erwin Schleicher1.   

Abstract

Although increased automation, advanced analytical techniques and sophisticated information technology have greatly improved the performance and quality in medical laboratory testing, several studies show that significant amounts of errors occur. Detailed analysis revealed that most of the errors occur in the preanalytical phase, while fewer errors occur in the intra- and post-analytical phase. The majority of errors are caused by wrong sampling or occur during transport to the laboratory. This review focuses on the analytical procedures in a large central laboratory. Possible problems are described by following samples from the patient to the laboratory and back. Finally, the advantages and disadvantages of point-of-care testing versus central laboratory are compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322977     DOI: 10.1007/s00216-005-0185-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem        ISSN: 1618-2642            Impact factor:   4.142


  6 in total

1.  The cost-benefit ratio of screening pregnant women for thrombophilia.

Authors:  Gian Luca Salvagno; Giuseppe Lippi; Massimo Franchini; Giovanni Targher; Martina Montagnana; Massimo Franchi; Gian Cesare Guidi
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  The relevance and potential roles of microphysiological systems in biology and medicine.

Authors:  John P Wikswo
Journal:  Exp Biol Med (Maywood)       Date:  2014-09

3.  Identification of Risk Factors for Abnormal Postoperative Chemistry Labs after Primary Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexis A Williams; Eric H Tischler; Daniel Sholder; Thema A Nicholson; Mitchell G Maltenfort; Charles Getz; Gerald Williams; Surena Namdari
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2018-07

Review 4.  Multianalyte Physiological Microanalytical Devices.

Authors:  Anna Nix Davis; Adam R Travis; Dusty R Miller; David E Cliffel
Journal:  Annu Rev Anal Chem (Palo Alto Calif)       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 12.400

Review 5.  Guidelines for the standardization of preanalytic variables for blood-based biomarker studies in Alzheimer's disease research.

Authors:  Sid E O'Bryant; Veer Gupta; Kim Henriksen; Melissa Edwards; Andreas Jeromin; Simone Lista; Chantal Bazenet; Holly Soares; Simon Lovestone; Harald Hampel; Thomas Montine; Kaj Blennow; Tatiana Foroud; Maria Carrillo; Neill Graff-Radford; Christoph Laske; Monique Breteler; Leslie Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Nicole Schupf; Robert A Rissman; Anne M Fagan; Pankaj Oberoi; Robert Umek; Michael W Weiner; Paula Grammas; Holly Posner; Ralph Martins
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 21.566

6.  Conductive Paper with Antibody-Like Film for Electrical Readings of Biomolecules.

Authors:  Ana P M Tavares; Nádia S Ferreira; Liliana A A N A Truta; M Goreti F Sales
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.