Literature DB >> 16322502

Patterns of diversity and linkage disequilibrium within the cosmopolitan inversion In(3R)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster are indicative of coadaptation.

W Jason Kennington1, Linda Partridge, Ary A Hoffmann.   

Abstract

The cosmopolitan inversion In(3R)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster decreases in frequency with increasing distance from the equator on three continents, indicating it is subject to strong natural selection. We investigated patterns of genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium (LD) in 24 molecular markers located within and near In(3R)Payne to determine if different parts of the inversion responded to selection the same way. We found reduced variation in the markers we used compared to others distributed throughout the genome, consistent with the inversion having a relatively recent origin (<N(e) generations). LD between markers and In(3R)Payne varied significantly among markers within the inversion, with regions of high association interspersed by regions of low association. Several factors indicate that these patterns were not due to demographic factors such as admixture and bottlenecks associated with colonization, but instead reflected strong epistatic selection. Furthermore, we found that nonadjacent regions with high association to the inversion contained markers with the strongest clinal patterns in allele frequency; in most cases, the level of clinal variation was beyond what could be explained by hitchhiking with In(3R)Payne, indicating that genes within these regions are targets of selection. Our results provide some support for the hypothesis that inversions persist in natural populations because they hold together favorable combinations of alleles that act together to facilitate adaptive shifts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322502      PMCID: PMC1456293          DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.053173

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genetics        ISSN: 0016-6731            Impact factor:   4.562


  35 in total

Review 1.  Inversion polymorphisms and nucleotide variability in Drosophila.

Authors:  P Andolfatto; F Depaulis; A Navarro
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data.

Authors:  J K Pritchard; M Stephens; P Donnelly
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Testing for asymmetrical gene flow in a Drosophila melanogaster body-size cline.

Authors:  W Jason Kennington; Julia Gockel; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  QTL mapping reveals a striking coincidence in the positions of genomic regions associated with adaptive variation in body size in parallel clines of Drosophila melanogaster on different continents.

Authors:  Federico C F Calboli; W Jason Kennington; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Testing differentiation in diploid populations.

Authors:  J Goudet; M Raymond; T de Meeüs; F Rousset
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  The latitudinal cline in the In(3R)Payne inversion polymorphism has shifted in the last 20 years in Australian Drosophila melanogaster populations.

Authors:  Alisha R Anderson; Ary A Hoffmann; Stephen W McKechnie; Paul A Umina; Andrew R Weeks
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 6.185

7.  The structure and population genetics of the breakpoints associated with the cosmopolitan chromosomal inversion In(3R)Payne in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Luciano M Matzkin; Thomas J S Merritt; Chen-Tseh Zhu; Walter F Eanes
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-03-21       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Multilevel analyses of genetic differentiation in Anopheles gambiae s.s. reveal patterns of gene flow important for malaria-fighting mosquito projects.

Authors:  Frédéric Tripet; Guimogo Dolo; Gregory C Lanzaro
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Chromosomal inversion polymorphisms and adaptation.

Authors:  Ary A Hoffmann; Carla M Sgrò; Andrew R Weeks
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 17.712

10.  Nonclinality of molecular variation implicates selection in maintaining a morphological cline of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  J Gockel; W J Kennington; A Hoffmann; D B Goldstein; L Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.562

View more
  32 in total

1.  Coalescent patterns for chromosomal inversions in divergent populations.

Authors:  Rafael F Guerrero; François Rousset; Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Mapping regions within cosmopolitan inversion In(3R)Payne associated with natural variation in body size in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W Jason Kennington; Ary A Hoffmann; Linda Partridge
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Evidence of spatially varying selection acting on four chromatin-remodeling loci in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Mia T Levine; David J Begun
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Gene flow and gene flux shape evolutionary patterns of variation in Drosophila subobscura.

Authors:  C Pegueroles; C F Aquadro; F Mestres; M Pascual
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-01-16       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  A sequential coalescent algorithm for chromosomal inversions.

Authors:  S Peischl; E Koch; R F Guerrero; M Kirkpatrick
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Chromosome inversions and ecological plasticity in the main African malaria mosquitoes.

Authors:  Diego Ayala; Pelayo Acevedo; Marco Pombi; Ibrahima Dia; Daniela Boccolini; Carlo Costantini; Frédéric Simard; Didier Fontenille
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Dobzhansky's concept of genetic coadaptation: Drosophila ananassae is an exception to this concept.

Authors:  Bashisth N Singh
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.166

8.  Young inversion with multiple linked QTLs under selection in a hybrid zone.

Authors:  Cheng-Ruei Lee; Baosheng Wang; Julius P Mojica; Terezie Mandáková; Kasavajhala V S K Prasad; Jose Luis Goicoechea; Nadeesha Perera; Uffe Hellsten; Hope N Hundley; Jenifer Johnson; Jane Grimwood; Kerrie Barry; Stephen Fairclough; Jerry W Jenkins; Yeisoo Yu; Dave Kudrna; Jianwei Zhang; Jayson Talag; Wolfgang Golser; Kathryn Ghattas; M Eric Schranz; Rod Wing; Martin A Lysak; Jeremy Schmutz; Daniel S Rokhsar; Thomas Mitchell-Olds
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 15.460

9.  Genome-wide patterns of adaptation to temperate environments associated with transposable elements in Drosophila.

Authors:  Josefa González; Talia L Karasov; Philipp W Messer; Dmitri A Petrov
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  How and why chromosome inversions evolve.

Authors:  Mark Kirkpatrick
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2010-09-28       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.