Literature DB >> 16322399

Surgery versus medical follow-up in patients with asymptomatic primary hyperparathyroidism: a decision analysis.

Karine Sejean1, Sophie Calmus, Isabelle Durand-Zaleski, Philippe Bonnichon, Pierre Thomopoulos, Catherine Cormier, Paul Legmann, Bruno Richard, Xavier Y Bertagna, Gwenaelle M Vidal-Trecan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To examine the cost-effectiveness of strategies for management of primary asymptomatic hyperparathyroidism: surgical strategies and medical follow-up versus surgery.
DESIGN: We used a Markov state-transition decision-analytic model for an hypothetical cohort of 55-year-old women to compare with a lifetime horizon costs and effectiveness of bilateral neck exploration (BNE), unilateral neck exploration (UNE), video-assisted parathyroidectomy (VAP) and lifelong medical follow-up shifting for either BNE or UNE in case of disease progression.
METHODS: Data on localization tests, complications and treatment efficacies were derived from a systematic review of the literature. Outcomes were expressed as quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Costs (2002 Euro) discounted at 3% yearly were estimated from the health care system perspective.
RESULTS: In the base-case analysis, VAP strategy (VAPS) was the most effective and BNE strategy (BNES) was the least costly. UNE strategy (UNES) had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of 2688 Euro/QALY versus BNES and VAPS of 17,250 Euro/QALY in comparison with UNES. Surgical management was more effective than medical follow-up with acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. VAPS became less effective than UNES over 71 years. Differences between UNES and VAPS were sensitive to success and complication rates, quality-of-life weights and procedural costs. Medical follow-up strategies became the most effective if quality-of-life weight for this condition was higher than 0.99.
CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is more effective than medical follow-up at a reasonable cost and can be preferred except in patients choosing medical follow-up. Minimally invasive surgery is cost-effective compared to the traditional surgical approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322399     DOI: 10.1530/eje.1.02029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol        ISSN: 0804-4643            Impact factor:   6.664


  9 in total

Review 1.  Mild primary hyperparathyroidism: a literature review.

Authors:  Megan K Applewhite; David F Schneider
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-07-25

2.  Selective use of Molecular Testing Based on Sonographic Features of Cytologically Indeterminate Thyroid Nodules: A Decision Analysis.

Authors:  Kyle A Zanocco; Max M Wang; Michael W Yeh; Masha J Livhits
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Improving diagnostic recognition of primary hyperparathyroidism with machine learning.

Authors:  Yash R Somnay; Mark Craven; Kelly L McCoy; Sally E Carty; Tracy S Wang; Caprice C Greenberg; David F Schneider
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 3.982

4.  Preoperative localization strategies for primary hyperparathyroidism: an economic analysis.

Authors:  Carrie C Lubitz; Antonia E Stephen; Richard A Hodin; Pari Pandharipande
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 5.  Comparative efficacy of parathyroidectomy and active surveillance in patients with mild primary hyperparathyroidism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  N Singh Ospina; S Maraka; R Rodriguez-Gutierrez; A E Espinosa de Ycaza; S Jasim; M Gionfriddo; A Castaneda-Guarderas; J P Brito; A Al Nofal; P Erwin; R Wermers; V Montori
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Cost-effectiveness of scan-directed parathyroidectomy.

Authors:  Radu Mihai; Mary Weisters; Michael J Stechman; Fergus Gleeson; Greg Sadler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 7.  Outcomes of Parathyroidectomy in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Naykky M Singh Ospina; Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez; Spyridoula Maraka; Ana E Espinosa de Ycaza; Sina Jasim; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Michael R Gionfriddo; Alaa Al Nofal; Juan P Brito; Patricia Erwin; Melanie Richards; Robert Wermers; Victor M Montori
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  18F-Fluorocholine PET and Multiphase CT Integrated in Dual Modality PET/4D-CT for Preoperative Evaluation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism.

Authors:  Valentin Pretet; Marianela Rotania; Mehdi Helali; Mihaela Ignat; Michel Vix; Alessio Imperiale
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Value within otolaryngology: Assessment of the cost-utility analysis literature.

Authors:  Krupa R Patel; David J Phillips; Jason M Leibowitz; Theresa Scognamiglio; Victoria E Banuchi; William I Kuhel; David I Kutler; Marc A Cohen
Journal:  World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2016-01-26
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.