Literature DB >> 16322115

Survival and prognostic factors in BRCA1-associated breast cancer.

C T M Brekelmans1, C Seynaeve, M Menke-Pluymers, H T Brüggenwirth, M M A Tilanus-Linthorst, C C M Bartels, M Kriege, A N van Geel, C M G Crepin, J C Blom, H Meijers-Heijboer, J G M Klijn.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies comparing survival in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancer (BC) report inconsistent results and frequently concern small sample sizes. Further, the prognostic impact of the classical tumour and treatment factors is unclear in BRCA1-associated BC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We selected 223 BC patients diagnosed between 1980 and 2001 within families with a deleterious germline BRCA1-mutation ascertained at the Rotterdam Family Cancer Clinic. To correct for ascertainment bias, the group of index patients undergoing DNA testing more than 2 years after BC diagnosis (n = 53) was separated from the other BRCA1-patients (n = 170). All BRCA1-associated patients were matched in a 1:2 ratio for age and year of diagnosis to sporadic BC patients. We compared the occurrence of ipsi- and contralateral BC (CBC) as well as distant disease-free (DDFS), BC-specific (BCSS) and overall survival (OS). By multivariate modelling, the prognostic impact of tumour and treatment factors was investigated separately in BRCA1-associated and sporadic breast cancers.
RESULTS: For the total group of 669 cases, the median follow-up was 5.1 years, the median age at diagnosis 39 years. We confirmed the existence of the typical BRCA1-associated tumour type and the high CBC incidence. No significant differences between BRCA1-associated and sporadic tumours were found with respect to ipsilateral BC recurrence (HR(mult) 0.7; P = 0.24), DDFS (HR(mult) 1.2; P = 0.37) or BC-specific survival (HR(mult) 1.3; P = 0.23). A trend towards a worse survival was found for BRCA1-associated ductal BC (HR(mult) 1.5, P = 0.07). Prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated BC were age at diagnosis, tumour size and morphology, and nodal status. Further, survival was non-significantly improved by systemic treatment and a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. No effect on survival of a contralateral prophylactic mastectomy was seen.
CONCLUSIONS: BRCA1-associated BC is characterised by specific tumour characteristics, a high incidence of CBC and a trend towards a worse survival for the ductal tumour type. Our observation that tumour size and nodal status are also prognostic factors for BRCA1-associated BC implies that the strategy to use these factors as a proxy for ultimate mortality, for instance in BC screening programmes or the consideration of (contralateral) preventive mastectomy, appears to be valid in this specific group of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322115     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdj095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  37 in total

Review 1.  Triple-negative breast cancer: present challenges and new perspectives.

Authors:  Franca Podo; Lutgarde M C Buydens; Hadassa Degani; Riet Hilhorst; Edda Klipp; Ingrid S Gribbestad; Sabine Van Huffel; Hanneke W M van Laarhoven; Jan Luts; Daniel Monleon; Geert J Postma; Nicole Schneiderhan-Marra; Filippo Santoro; Hans Wouters; Hege G Russnes; Therese Sørlie; Elda Tagliabue; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale
Journal:  Mol Oncol       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.603

Review 2.  Fine tuning chemotherapy to match BRCA1 status.

Authors:  Melissa Price; Alvaro N A Monteiro
Journal:  Biochem Pharmacol       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.858

Review 3.  The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Alison H Trainer; Craig R Lewis; Kathy Tucker; Bettina Meiser; Michael Friedlander; Robyn L Ward
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 66.675

4.  Population-based study of the risk of second primary contralateral breast cancer associated with carrying a mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2.

Authors:  Kathleen E Malone; Colin B Begg; Robert W Haile; Ake Borg; Patrick Concannon; Lina Tellhed; Shanyan Xue; Sharon Teraoka; Leslie Bernstein; Marinela Capanu; Anne S Reiner; Elyn R Riedel; Duncan C Thomas; Lene Mellemkjaer; Charles F Lynch; John D Boice; Hoda Anton-Culver; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Is breast-conserving therapy adequate in BRCA 1/2 mutation carriers? The radiation oncologist's point of view.

Authors:  Alexis Vallard; Nicolas Magné; Jean-Baptiste Guy; Sophie Espenel; Chloé Rancoule; Peng Diao; Eric Deutsch; Sofia Rivera; Cyrus Chargari
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-02-27       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Clinical outcome of triple negative breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers and noncarriers.

Authors:  Larissa J Lee; Brian Alexander; Stuart J Schnitt; Amy Comander; Bridget Gallagher; Judy E Garber; Nadine Tung
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-01-24       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 7.  BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy.

Authors:  Karen Lisa Smith; Claudine Isaacs
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

8.  Epigenetic regulation of ID4 in the determination of the BRCAness phenotype in breast cancer.

Authors:  M T Branham; E Campoy; S Laurito; R Branham; G Urrutia; J Orozco; F Gago; R Urrutia; M Roqué
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 9.  Genetic epidemiology of acute respiratory distress syndrome: implications for future prevention and treatment.

Authors:  Michelle Ng Gong
Journal:  Clin Chest Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.878

10.  Thresholds for therapies: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2009.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; J N Ingle; R D Gelber; A S Coates; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-06-17       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.