Literature DB >> 16322100

Comparison between a cognitive behavioural alcohol programme and post-mailed minimal intervention in high-risk drinking university freshmen: results from a randomized controlled trial.

Kent O Johnsson1, Mats Berglund.   

Abstract

AIM: Examine the effect of a 10 h intervention programme compared with post-mailed minimal intervention (PMMI) given to high-risk alcohol-drinking university freshmen in a random design.
METHOD: In total 693 freshmen at the Lund Institute of Technology, Lund University, Sweden were included in the study. A cognitive behavioural alcohol program (CBAP) or PMMI was given to high-risk drinking freshmen (n = 177) in a randomized design. A 10-item screening instrument, Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT), was used before and 1 year after the intervention programmes were given.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the CBAP and the PMMI groups. Both groups declined their AUDIT scores with -1.7 [CI 95% -2.6, -0.7] and -2.7 [CI 95% -3.6, -1.7], respectively which could be explained by effects of regression to the mean.
CONCLUSION: No significant differences between the groups were found.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16322100     DOI: 10.1093/alcalc/agh243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol        ISSN: 0735-0414            Impact factor:   2.826


  8 in total

1.  Reducing Alcohol Risk in Adjudicated Male College Students: Further Validation of a Group Motivational Enhancement Intervention.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBRIE; Jessica Cail; Eric R Pedersen; Savannah Migliuri
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse       Date:  2010-12

2.  Alcohol use among university students in Sweden measured by an electronic screening instrument.

Authors:  Agneta Andersson; Ann-Britt Wiréhn; Christina Olvander; Diana Stark Ekman; Preben Bendtsen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 3.295

3.  Alcohol trajectories over three years in a Swedish residence hall student population.

Authors:  Henriettae Ståhlbrandt; Anders Leifman; Kent O Johnsson; Mats Berglund
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-29       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 4.  Individual-level interventions to reduce college student drinking: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Kate B Carey; Lori A J Scott-Sheldon; Michael P Carey; Kelly S DeMartini
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.913

Review 5.  Motivational interviewing for substance abuse.

Authors:  Geir Smedslund; Rigmor C Berg; Karianne T Hammerstrøm; Asbjørn Steiro; Kari A Leiknes; Helene M Dahl; Kjetil Karlsen
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-05-11

6.  Validation of the Amsterdam Beverage Picture Set: A Controlled Picture Set for Cognitive Bias Measurement and Modification Paradigms.

Authors:  Thomas Pronk; Denise S van Deursen; Esther M Beraha; Helle Larsen; Reinout W Wiers
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.455

7.  Personalised normative feedback for preventing alcohol misuse in university students: Solomon three-group randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Maria T Moreira; Reza Oskrochi; David R Foxcroft
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Cross-cultural patterns in college student drinking and its consequences--a comparison between the USA and Sweden.

Authors:  Henriettae Ståhlbrandt; Claes Andersson; Kent O Johnsson; Sean J Tollison; Mats Berglund; Mary E Larimer
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2008-07-01       Impact factor: 2.826

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.